ANIL SAKHARAM GURAV vs NAINESH BHALCHANDRA DALI AND ANR. — IA/582/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM070046992026

Filing Number

IA/3256/2026

Filing Date

20-Apr-2026

Registration No

IA/582/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. Chandwani

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. Chandwani

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANIL SAKHARAM GURAV

    Adv. Hitesh P Shah

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NAINESH BHALCHANDRA DALI AND ANR.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. ChandwaniView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay's Circuit Bench at Kolhapur granted Anil Sakharam Gurav's application to restore Writ Petition No. 2795 of 2020, which had been dismissed in default on 02.04.2026 for lack of prosecution. The court accepted the petitioner's explanation that his counsel, practicing at the Principal Bench in Bombay, lost track of the matter after its transfer to Kolhapur Circuit Bench. The writ petition was restored subject to payment of Rs. 2,000 as cost to the Bar Association. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. Chandwani

  4. 20-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/582/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay's Circuit Bench at Kolhapur granted Anil Sakharam Gurav's application to restore Writ Petition No. 2795 of 2020, which had been dismissed in default on 02.04.2026 for lack of prosecution. The court accepted the petitioner's explanation that his counsel, practicing at the Principal Bench in Bombay, lost track of the matter after its transfer to Kolhapur Circuit Bench. The writ petition was restored subject to payment of Rs. 2,000 as cost to the Bar Association. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case