SWAPNIL DADASO VAYDANDE THR DADASO BABASO VAYDANDEAND ORS. vs THE SANGLI MIRAJ KUPWAD CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THR. ITS COMMISSIONER AND ORS. Advocate - Kirankumar Phakade — WP/1638/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM070039052026

Filing Number

WP/2707/2026

Filing Date

04-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/1638/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin Sheshrao Patil

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin Sheshrao Patil

Bench Type

Division

Category

TOWN PLANNING ( 39 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Mah. Regional Town Planning Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SWAPNIL DADASO VAYDANDE THR DADASO BABASO VAYDANDEAND ORS.

    Adv. Kuldeep U Nikam

  2. 2.VIKRANT VASANT RANBHISE

  3. 3.DADASO BABURAO PAWAR

  4. 4.SUMAN BIRAPPA DHANGONDA

  5. 5.TAMAYYA SOMA NAIK

  6. 6.FARUK BADSHA PARANDE

  7. 7.MAHESH BABURAO KOLI

  8. 8.AMAR SUKUMAR PATIL THR SARJERAO VISHNU GAIKWAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE SANGLI MIRAJ KUPWAD CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THR. ITS COMMISSIONER AND ORS. Advocate - Kirankumar Phakade

  2. 2.DESIGNATED OFFICER AND BRANCH ENGINEER, SANGLI MIRAJ KUPWAD CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

  3. 3.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR GOVERNMENT PLEADER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Aug-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin Sheshrao Patil

  3. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar,hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin Sheshrao PatilView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/1638/2026 The Bombay High Court (Kolhapur Bench) allowed the writ petition filed by shop owners against the Sangli Miraj Kupwad City Municipal Corporation for illegally demolishing their shop premises in violation of Supreme Court directions on demolition procedures. The Municipal Corporation's counsel tendered an unconditional apology, which the court accepted. The court granted relief allowing reconstruction of the demolished structures and quashing the demolition proceedings, while the petitioners withdrew their claim for compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 07-May-2026

    First On Board (Fob)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin Sheshrao Patil

  5. 06-May-2026

    First On Board -

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin Sheshrao Patil

  6. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar,hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin Sheshrao PatilView PDF

  7. 29-Apr-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin Sheshrao Patil

  8. 20-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar,hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin Sheshrao PatilView PDF

  9. 20-Apr-2026

    Petition For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin Sheshrao Patil

  10. 09-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar,hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin Sheshrao PatilView PDF

  11. 09-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 04-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/1638/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/1638/2026 The Bombay High Court (Kolhapur Bench) allowed the writ petition filed by shop owners against the Sangli Miraj Kupwad City Municipal Corporation for illegally demolishing their shop premises in violation of Supreme Court directions on demolition procedures. The Municipal Corporation's counsel tendered an unconditional apology, which the court accepted. The court granted relief allowing reconstruction of the demolished structures and quashing the demolition proceedings, while the petitioners withdrew their claim for compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case