SHAKERABANU AFSAR PATEL M S MULLA, ,M S MULLA vs PARSHURAM GUNDU TARAL — IA/546/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 100. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM070038802026

e-Filing Number

02-04-2026

Filing Number

IA/2690/2026

Filing Date

02-Apr-2026

Registration No

IA/546/2026

Registration Date

24-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil Laxman Pansare

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil Laxman Pansare

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 100

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHAKERABANU AFSAR PATEL M S MULLA, ,M S MULLA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PARSHURAM GUNDU TARAL

  2. 2.Sudhir Baburao Terwadkar Decd thr Sunita Sudhir Terwadkar

  3. 3.Sudhir Baburao Terwadkar decd thr Ninad Sudhir Terwadkar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil Laxman PansareView PDF

    Case Summary: IA/546/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Kolhapur Bench) rejected the applicant Shakerabanu Afsar Patel's application seeking to recall a July 2017 consent decree in Second Appeal No. 690 of 2014. The applicant falsely claimed knowledge of the order only in 2021, but evidence showed he was aware through multiple revenue proceedings (RTS No. 455 of 2018, RTS Appeal No. 925 of 2016) and court documents filed in 2019. Citing *Pundlik Jalam Patil v. Executive Engineer*, the court held that making false statements to circumvent limitation bars warrants automatic rejection and should not be rewarded with delay condonation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    For Orders (Due Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil Laxman Pansare

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil Laxman PansareView PDF

  5. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil Laxman PansareView PDF

  6. 02-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/546/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: IA/546/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Kolhapur Bench) rejected the applicant Shakerabanu Afsar Patel's application seeking to recall a July 2017 consent decree in Second Appeal No. 690 of 2014. The applicant falsely claimed knowledge of the order only in 2021, but evidence showed he was aware through multiple revenue proceedings (RTS No. 455 of 2018, RTS Appeal No. 925 of 2016) and court documents filed in 2019. Citing *Pundlik Jalam Patil v. Executive Engineer*, the court held that making false statements to circumvent limitation bars warrants automatic rejection and should not be rewarded with delay condonation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case