YALLING ALIAS YALLAPPA IRANNA PUJARI vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR — WP/227/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM070016092026

Filing Number

WP/522/2026

Filing Date

07-Feb-2026

Registration No

WP/227/2026

Registration Date

26-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Vrushali V. Joshi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandesh Dadasaheb Patil

Coram

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Vrushali V. Joshi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandesh Dadasaheb Patil

Bench Type

Division

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.YALLING ALIAS YALLAPPA IRANNA PUJARI

    Adv. Prasad Arun Kamthe

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

  2. 2.COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, SOLAPUR

  3. 3.THE SUPERINTENDENT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Vrushali V. Joshi,hon'ble Shri Justice Sandesh Dadasaheb PatilView PDF

    Summary of WP/227/2026 The High Court of Bombay at Kolhapur dismissed the petitioner Yalling Alias Yallappa Iranna Pujari's challenge to his detention order dated November 7, 2025, passed under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981. The court found that the detaining authority had properly exercised subjective satisfaction based on three serious crimes—assault with weapons, public threats, and armed possession—all committed in public places that disturbed public order. The court rejected the petitioner's argument that bail cancellation remedies should have been pursued instead, finding that the detention order explicitly considered the bail status and that the petitioner's pattern of violent behavior since 2019 justified preventive detention to maintain public order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Vrushali V. Joshi,hon'ble Shri Justice Sandesh Dadasaheb PatilView PDF

  4. 09-Jun-2026

    Petition For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin Sheshrao Patil

  5. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar,hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin Sheshrao PatilView PDF

  6. 06-May-2026

    For Ad-Interim Relief

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin Sheshrao Patil

  7. 30-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar,hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin Sheshrao PatilView PDF

  8. 30-Apr-2026

    High On Board (Hob)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin Sheshrao Patil

  9. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar,hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin Sheshrao PatilView PDF

  10. 10-Apr-2026

    For Direction

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin Sheshrao Patil

  11. 09-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 07-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/227/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WP/227/2026 The High Court of Bombay at Kolhapur dismissed the petitioner Yalling Alias Yallappa Iranna Pujari's challenge to his detention order dated November 7, 2025, passed under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981. The court found that the detaining authority had properly exercised subjective satisfaction based on three serious crimes—assault with weapons, public threats, and armed possession—all committed in public places that disturbed public order. The court rejected the petitioner's argument that bail cancellation remedies should have been pursued instead, finding that the detention order explicitly considered the bail status and that the petitioner's pattern of violent behavior since 2019 justified preventive detention to maintain public order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case