Shakerabanu Afsar Patel vs Parshuram Gundu Taral — HCBM70001272026
Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 100. Disposed: Rejected on 07th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM070001272026
e-Filing Number
05-01-2026
Filing Number
IA/82/2026
Filing Date
06-Jan-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil Laxman Pansare
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil Laxman Pansare
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Rejected
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shakerabanu Afsar Patel
Adv. Adv S G Kudle
Respondent(s)
-
1.Parshuram Gundu Taral
-
2.Sudhir Baburao Terwadkar Decd Thr Sunita Sudhir Terwadkar
-
3.Sudhir Baburao Terwadkar Decd Thr Ninad Sudhir Terwadkar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil Laxman PansareView PDF
Case Summary The Bombay High Court (Kolhapur Bench) rejected Shakerabanu Afsar Patel's application seeking to recall a 2017 consent decree in Second Appeal No. 690 of 2014. The applicant claimed lack of knowledge about the decree until 2021, but the court found evidence—including revenue authority proceedings and civil suit documents from 2018-2019 in which the applicant participated—proving he had actual knowledge of the appeal and compromise much earlier. The court held the applicant made knowingly false statements to overcome limitation and rejected the application without further inquiry, citing Supreme Court precedent against rewarding such falsehoods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
For Orders (Due Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil Laxman Pansare
-
30-Apr-2026
For Orders (Due Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil Laxman Pansare
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil Laxman PansareView PDF
-
17-Apr-2026
For Orders (Due Matters)
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Vrushali V. Joshi
-
12-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Vrushali V. JoshiView PDF
-
06-Jan-2026
Case filed
Case Summary The Bombay High Court (Kolhapur Bench) rejected Shakerabanu Afsar Patel's application seeking to recall a 2017 consent decree in Second Appeal No. 690 of 2014. The applicant claimed lack of knowledge about the decree until 2021, but the court found evidence—including revenue authority proceedings and civil suit documents from 2018-2019 in which the applicant participated—proving he had actual knowledge of the appeal and compromise much earlier. The court held the applicant made knowingly false statements to overcome limitation and rejected the application without further inquiry, citing Supreme Court precedent against rewarding such falsehoods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts