ADELINA DA SACRADA FAMILIA CARVALHO E FERNANDES since deceased through her Legal representatives vs SEBASTIANA FERNANDES ALIAS MASLIN AND 26 ORS — AO/17/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 43 Rule 1(u). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 24th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM050044922025

e-Filing Number

09-12-2025

Filing Number

AO/3242/2025

Filing Date

09-Dec-2025

Registration No

AO/17/2026

Registration Date

24-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL SECTION

Decision Date

24-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 43 Rule 1(u)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ADELINA DA SACRADA FAMILIA CARVALHO E FERNANDES since deceased through her Legal representatives

    Adv. MARIE ROSETTE PEREIRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SEBASTIANA FERNANDES ALIAS MASLIN AND 26 ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki MenezesView PDF

  3. 07-May-2026

    For Orders - First On Board

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki MenezesView PDF

    Case Summary: AO 17/2026 Court: High Court of Bombay at Goa Date: 24 April 2026 Judge: Valmiki Menezes, J. The High Court allowed the appellants' second appeal, quashing the District Court's remand order dated 14 October 2025. The court held that the District Court erroneously remanded a property partition suit back to the trial court without legal justification under CPC Order 41, Rules 23-23A. The trial court had correctly determined that plaintiffs proved pre-existing rights via an unregistered 1983 Partition Deed, and partition of property shares can be determined even from unregistered documents since such deeds do not operate as title transfers. The court restored the case to the District Court for decision on its merits within four months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 24-Apr-2026

    For Admission - After Notice

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes

  6. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki MenezesView PDF

  7. 16-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 12-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki MenezesView PDF

  9. 09-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. AO/17/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: AO 17/2026 Court: High Court of Bombay at Goa Date: 24 April 2026 Judge: Valmiki Menezes, J. The High Court allowed the appellants' second appeal, quashing the District Court's remand order dated 14 October 2025. The court held that the District Court erroneously remanded a property partition suit back to the trial court without legal justification under CPC Order 41, Rules 23-23A. The trial court had correctly determined that plaintiffs proved pre-existing rights via an unregistered 1983 Partition Deed, and partition of property shares can be determined even from unregistered documents since such deeds do not operate as title transfers. The court restored the case to the District Court for decision on its merits within four months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case