JEANETTE FERNANDES vs THE STATE OF GOA, THR. THE CHIEF SECRETARY AND 16 ORS — HCBM50031182025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM050031182025
Filing Number
MCA/2286/2025
Filing Date
29-Aug-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes , Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit S. Jamsandekar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes , Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit S. Jamsandekar
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL SECTION
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JEANETTE FERNANDES
Adv. ROHIT BRAS DE SA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GOA, THR. THE CHIEF SECRETARY AND 16 ORS
-
2.COLLECTOR-NORTH GOA
-
3.THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR-BARDEZ AND FLYING SQUAD IN-CHARGE (NORTH GOA)
-
4.THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THR. CHIEF TOWN PLANNER
-
5.THE DEPUTY TOWN PLANNER-BARDEZ
-
6.THE VILLAGE PANCHAYAT OF NERUL, THR. THE SECRETARY
-
7.THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER-BARDEZ
-
8.THE DIRECTORATE OF PANCHAYATS, THR. THE DIRECTOR
-
9.GOA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, THR. ITS MEMBER SECRETARY
-
10.DIRECTORATE OF TOURISM, THR. ITS DIRECTOR
-
11.PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE-CANDOLIM, THR. THE HEALTH OFFICER-INCHARGE
-
12.THE DIRECTORATE OF HEALTH SERVICES, THR. ITS DIRECTOR
-
13.DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICITY, THR. ITS DIRECTOR
-
14.DIRECTORATE OF VIGILANCE, THR. ITS DIRECTOR
-
15.ARDEE FOUNDATION REPRESENTED BY DIRECTOR MRS. SHEFALI VERMA
-
16.INDER DEV MUSAFIR
-
17.LEENA MUSAFIR
Case History
-
05-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
23-Jun-2026
For Orders - Part Heard
Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes , Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit S. Jamsandekar
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes,hon'ble Shri Justice Amit S. JamsandekarView PDF
Case Summary Jeanette Fernandes v. The State of Goa (MCA 1280/2025, High Court of Bombay at Goa, 5 May 2026) The court partially granted the petitioner's application for inspection of disputed land. For Survey No. 101/2, no fresh inspection was ordered as the Town Planning Department had already inspected and reported land filling activities on 8 May 2025. For Survey No. 101/1, the court directed the Town Planner to conduct an inspection within six weeks, prepare a detailed report comparing existing structures against approved plans, and submit photographs and site plans. The inspection was scheduled for 14 May 2026 with police personnel directed to ensure order. The case was adjourned to 23 June 2026. All objections by respondents regarding maintainability were kept open. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
For Orders - Part Heard
Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes , Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit S. Jamsandekar
-
04-May-2026
For Orders - Part Heard
Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes , Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit S. Jamsandekar
-
27-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes,hon'ble Shri Justice Amit S. JamsandekarView PDF
-
27-Apr-2026
For Orders - Part Heard
Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes , Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit S. Jamsandekar
-
03-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes,hon'ble Shri Justice Amit S. JamsandekarView PDF
-
15-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre,hon'ble Shri Justice Ashish S. ChavanView PDF
-
29-Aug-2025
Case filed
Case Summary Jeanette Fernandes v. The State of Goa (MCA 1280/2025, High Court of Bombay at Goa, 5 May 2026) The court partially granted the petitioner's application for inspection of disputed land. For Survey No. 101/2, no fresh inspection was ordered as the Town Planning Department had already inspected and reported land filling activities on 8 May 2025. For Survey No. 101/1, the court directed the Town Planner to conduct an inspection within six weeks, prepare a detailed report comparing existing structures against approved plans, and submit photographs and site plans. The inspection was scheduled for 14 May 2026 with police personnel directed to ensure order. The case was adjourned to 23 June 2026. All objections by respondents regarding maintainability were kept open. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts