SULAKSHA SUNIL GOVEKAR RAVIRAJ RAMESH CHODANKAR01 vs VPK URBAN CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOC. LTD. THR. ITS AUTH. REP. DIVAKAR KRISHNA DHARGALKAR AND ANR Advocate - JATIN RAMAIYA — HCBM50022832025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 438and442. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM050022832025
e-Filing Number
27-06-2025
Filing Number
CRIR/585/2025
Filing Date
30-Jun-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashish S. Chavan
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashish S. Chavan
Bench Type
Single
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
AGAINST ORDER OF ACQUITTAL ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL SECTION
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SULAKSHA SUNIL GOVEKAR RAVIRAJ RAMESH CHODANKAR01
Respondent(s)
-
1.VPK URBAN CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOC. LTD. THR. ITS AUTH. REP. DIVAKAR KRISHNA DHARGALKAR AND ANR Advocate - JATIN RAMAIYA
-
2.The State of Goa Through Public Prosecutor
Case History
-
24-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Jun-2026
For Admission - After Notice
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashish S. Chavan
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashish S. ChavanView PDF
Case Summary In this Criminal Revision Application before the High Court of Bombay at Goa, applicant Sulaksha Sunil Govekar challenged conviction findings related to a loan dispute with VPK Urban Co-operative Credit Society. The court adjourned the case for arguments on 24.06.2026, directing the applicant to revalidate/reissue an expired demand draft of Rs. 2,00,000 before the next hearing. The court encouraged settlement between parties and noted that undertakings alone would not constitute logical progress given the loan quantum and compensation balance outstanding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
For Admission - After Notice
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashish S. Chavan
-
16-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashish S. ChavanView PDF
-
16-Apr-2026
For Admission - After Notice
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashish S. Chavan
-
27-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashish S. ChavanView PDF
-
27-Mar-2026
For Admission - After Notice
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit S. Jamsandekar
-
26-Feb-2026
For Admission - After Notice
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit S. Jamsandekar
-
13-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit S. JamsandekarView PDF
-
13-Feb-2026
For Admission - After Notice
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit S. Jamsandekar
-
12-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit S. JamsandekarView PDF
-
12-Feb-2026
For Admission - After Notice
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit S. Jamsandekar
-
30-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit S. JamsandekarView PDF
-
09-Jan-2026
For Admission - After Notice
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashish S. Chavan
-
28-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashish S. ChavanView PDF
-
24-Nov-2025
For Admission - After Notice
Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes
-
13-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki MenezesView PDF
-
13-Oct-2025
For Admission - Fresh
Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes
-
16-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki MenezesView PDF
-
16-Sep-2025
For Admission - Fresh
Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes
-
02-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki MenezesView PDF
-
02-Sep-2025
For Admission - Fresh
Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes
-
19-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki MenezesView PDF
-
19-Aug-2025
For Admission - Fresh
Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes
-
18-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki MenezesView PDF
-
18-Aug-2025
For Admission - Fresh
Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes
-
14-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki MenezesView PDF
-
14-Jul-2025
For Admission - First On Board
Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes
-
03-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki MenezesView PDF
-
03-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Jun-2025
Case filed
Case Summary In this Criminal Revision Application before the High Court of Bombay at Goa, applicant Sulaksha Sunil Govekar challenged conviction findings related to a loan dispute with VPK Urban Co-operative Credit Society. The court adjourned the case for arguments on 24.06.2026, directing the applicant to revalidate/reissue an expired demand draft of Rs. 2,00,000 before the next hearing. The court encouraged settlement between parties and noted that undertakings alone would not constitute logical progress given the loan quantum and compensation balance outstanding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts