MARIA RITA FERNANDES, REPRESENTED BY ATTORNEY MR. FRANCISCO REMEDIOS PEREIRA AND 4 ORS vs CHINGLU PADHU BAVDANE AND 3 ORS Advocate - Nevrekar Vinayak, ADV VINAYAK NEVREKAR FOR R NOS 1 AND 2 — SA/2/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 100. Next hearing: 10th July 2026.

Next hearing 10-Jul-2026

CNR: HCBM050021802024

e-Filing Number

04-07-2024

Filing Number

SA/1599/2024

Filing Date

04-Jul-2024

Registration No

SA/2/2025

Registration Date

26-Feb-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit S. Jamsandekar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit S. Jamsandekar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL SECTION

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 100

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MARIA RITA FERNANDES, REPRESENTED BY ATTORNEY MR. FRANCISCO REMEDIOS PEREIRA AND 4 ORS

    Adv. VISHAL SAWANT

  2. 2.SMT. MONICA DEODITA D COSTA REP. BY ATTORNEY MR. FRANCISCO REMEDIOS PEREIRA

  3. 3.MOSES MASCARENHAS REP. BY ATTORNEY MR. FRANCISCO REMEDIOS PEREIRA

  4. 4.SARITA D COSTA REP. BY ATTORNEY MR. FRANCISCO REMEDIOS PEREIRA

  5. 5.DONALD RODRIGUES REP. BY ATTORNEY MR. FRANCISCO REMEDIOS PEREIRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHINGLU PADHU BAVDANE AND 3 ORS Advocate - Nevrekar Vinayak, ADV VINAYAK NEVREKAR FOR R NOS 1 AND 2

  2. 2.BHUNDO DHAKU VARAK

  3. 3.COMMUNIDADE OF ASTRAGAR THR. ITS ATTORNEY SHRI NAGESH N. PRABHUDESSAI

  4. 4.ADMINISTRATOR OF COMMUNIDADE OF SALCETE

Case History

  1. 10-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Jul-2026

    For Admission - After Notice

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit S. Jamsandekar

  3. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit S. JamsandekarView PDF

    Case Summary: SA 2/2025 Court: High Court of Bombay at Goa Date: 8th May 2026 Judge: Amit S. Jamsandekar, J. Outcome: Second Appeal admitted on three substantial questions of law. The appellants challenged the District Judge's findings regarding tenancy declarations by the Mamlatdar of Sanguem and the applicability of res judicata from Civil Suit 10/2008, contending they were not parties to these proceedings. Notice issued to Respondents 3 and 4, returnable 10th July 2026. Respondents retain the right to contend no substantial questions of law arise. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 16-Jan-2026

    For Admission - After Notice

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashish S. Chavan

  5. 28-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashish S. ChavanView PDF

  6. 27-Nov-2025

    For Admission - After Notice

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes

  7. 08-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki MenezesView PDF

  8. 08-Oct-2025

    For Admission - After Notice

    Hon'ble Ms Justice Nivedita P. Mehta

  9. 12-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Ms Justice Nivedita P. MehtaView PDF

  10. 12-Sep-2025

    For Admission - After Notice

    Hon'ble Ms Justice Nivedita P. Mehta

  11. 01-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Ms Justice Nivedita P. MehtaView PDF

  12. 01-Aug-2025

    For Admission - After Notice

    Hon'ble Ms Justice Nivedita P. Mehta

  13. 20-Jun-2025

    Hon'ble Ms Justice Nivedita P. MehtaView PDF

  14. 20-Jun-2025

    For Admission - After Notice

    Hon'ble Ms Justice Nivedita P. Mehta

  15. 13-Jun-2025

    For Admission - After Notice

    Hon'ble Ms Justice Nivedita P. Mehta

  16. 25-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Ms Justice Nivedita P. MehtaView PDF

  17. 21-Apr-2025

    For Admission - Fresh

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre

  18. 19-Mar-2025

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati DangreView PDF

  19. 19-Mar-2025

    For Admission - Fresh

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre

  20. 17-Mar-2025

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati DangreView PDF

  21. 17-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 24-Jan-2025

    RegistrarView PDF

  23. 03-Jan-2025

    RegistrarView PDF

  24. 22-Nov-2024

    RegistrarView PDF

  25. 13-Sep-2024

    RegistrarView PDF

  26. 23-Aug-2024

    RegistrarView PDF

  27. 04-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. SA/2/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SA 2/2025 Court: High Court of Bombay at Goa Date: 8th May 2026 Judge: Amit S. Jamsandekar, J. Outcome: Second Appeal admitted on three substantial questions of law. The appellants challenged the District Judge's findings regarding tenancy declarations by the Mamlatdar of Sanguem and the applicability of res judicata from Civil Suit 10/2008, contending they were not parties to these proceedings. Notice issued to Respondents 3 and 4, returnable 10th July 2026. Respondents retain the right to contend no substantial questions of law arise. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case