M/S DAMODAR MANGALJI AND CO LTD THR ITS DIRECTOR AND ANR. vs THE STATE OF GOA THR THE SECRETARY (REVENUE) AND 3 ORS. — HCBM50021482026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226, 227. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM050021482026
Filing Number
WP/1575/2026
Filing Date
10-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Dr. Justice Neela Gokhale
Coram
Hon'ble Dr. Justice Neela Gokhale
Bench Type
Single
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL SECTION
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S DAMODAR MANGALJI AND CO LTD THR ITS DIRECTOR AND ANR.
Adv. SHIVAN DESAI,VISHWOM REVANKAR,VISHWOM REVANKAR, ,COTA VIEGAS MARIA CARMEL TERESA DE JESUS,Jonathan George,NATHAN SAVIO VAS,TAHIRA MENEZES ISMALIA D,Amonkar Riya Pratap,Thorat Aishwarya Ajay,VISHWOM REVANKAR
-
2.M/S DAMODAR MANGALJI MINING COMPANY REP BY PARTNER
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GOA THR THE SECRETARY (REVENUE) AND 3 ORS.
-
2.THE COLLECTOR NORTH GOA
-
3.THE ADMINISTRATOR OF COMMUNIDADE NORTH GOA
-
4.THE COMMUNIDADE OF NAVELIM REP BY ITS ATTORNEY
Case History
-
29-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
29-Jun-2026
For Admission - First On Board
Hon'ble Dr. Justice Neela Gokhale
-
17-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Dr. Justice Neela GokhaleView PDF
Case Summary: In Writ Petition No. 1575 of 2026 before the High Court of Bombay at Goa, the court adjourned the matter to 29th June, 2026. Respondent No. 4's counsel was granted one week to file an affidavit with an advance copy to petitioner's counsel, and undertook that no coercive steps would be taken against the petitioner in the interim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Jun-2026
Case filed
Case Summary: In Writ Petition No. 1575 of 2026 before the High Court of Bombay at Goa, the court adjourned the matter to 29th June, 2026. Respondent No. 4's counsel was granted one week to file an affidavit with an advance copy to petitioner's counsel, and undertook that no coercive steps would be taken against the petitioner in the interim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts