DIOCESAN SOCIETY OF EDUCATION REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY FR. JESUS NAZARETH RODRIGUES vs REGIONAL P.F. COMMISSIONER -I AND ANR — HCBM50021302026
Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM050021302026
Filing Number
WP/1560/2026
Filing Date
09-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Dr. Justice Neela Gokhale
Coram
Hon'ble Dr. Justice Neela Gokhale
Bench Type
Single
Category
LABOUR MATTERS SINGLE BENCH ( 65 )
Sub-Category
PROVIDENT FUND ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL SECTION
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DIOCESAN SOCIETY OF EDUCATION REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY FR. JESUS NAZARETH RODRIGUES
Adv. BANGERA SMRATI RAJENDRANATH
Respondent(s)
-
1.REGIONAL P.F. COMMISSIONER -I AND ANR
-
2.THE MANAGER BANK OF INDIA
Case History
-
09-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Dr. Justice Neela GokhaleView PDF
Case Summary: The Diocesan Society of Education's writ petition challenging a Regional PF Commissioner's order directing payment of Rs. 1,84,28,498 under the Employees Provident Fund Act was disposed of. The court stayed the effect of the PF Commissioner's order dated 5th June 2026 and directed the Nagpur Bench Tribunal to hear the petitioner's appeal expeditiously, noting there was a vacancy at the Mumbai Tribunal. The petition was dismissed as the underlying appeal would be heard on merits by the Tribunal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jun-2026
For Admission - First On Board
Hon'ble Dr. Justice Neela Gokhale
-
09-Jun-2026
Case filed
Case Summary: The Diocesan Society of Education's writ petition challenging a Regional PF Commissioner's order directing payment of Rs. 1,84,28,498 under the Employees Provident Fund Act was disposed of. The court stayed the effect of the PF Commissioner's order dated 5th June 2026 and directed the Nagpur Bench Tribunal to hear the petitioner's appeal expeditiously, noting there was a vacancy at the Mumbai Tribunal. The petition was dismissed as the underlying appeal would be heard on merits by the Tribunal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts