ALDILA BRAGANZA AND ANR vs ANTONETTO JOHN A DSOUZA AND ANR. — HCBM50018672026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM050018672026
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
MCA/1379/2026
Filing Date
05-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VALMIKI MENEZES , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VALMIKI MENEZES , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL SECTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ALDILA BRAGANZA AND ANR
JOSEPH B. BRAGANZA
Respondent(s)
ANTONETTO JOHN A DSOUZA AND ANR.
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VALMIKI MENEZES , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR
FOR ORDERS - FIRST ON BOARD
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-06-2026 | FOR ORDERS - FIRST ON BOARD |
Orders
The High Court of Bombay at Goa heard two consolidated Miscellaneous Civil Applications (MCA-1505-2026 and MCA-1379-2026) filed by Joseph Baptista Braganza and Aldila Braganza respectively against Antonetto John A D'Souza and others. The court ordered that both applications must be heard by the original bench (Valmiki Menezes & Amit S. Jamsandekar, JJ.) that had reserved judgment on the main application, requiring that bench to be reconstituted for proper adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Bombay at Goa heard two consolidated Miscellaneous Civil Applications (MCA-1505-2026 and MCA-1379-2026) filed by Joseph Baptista Braganza and Aldila Braganza respectively against Antonetto John A D'Souza and others. The court ordered that both applications must be heard by the original bench (Valmiki Menezes & Amit S. Jamsandekar, JJ.) that had reserved judgment on the main application, requiring that bench to be reconstituted for proper adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts