ALDILA BRAGANZA AND ANR vs ANTONETTO JOHN A DSOUZA AND ANR. — HCBM50018672026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM050018672026

Filing Number

MCA/1379/2026

Filing Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten S. Venegavkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten S. Venegavkar

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL SECTION

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 151

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ALDILA BRAGANZA AND ANR

  2. 2.JOSEPH B. BRAGANZA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ANTONETTO JOHN A DSOUZA AND ANR.

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes,hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten S. VenegavkarView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay at Goa heard two consolidated Miscellaneous Civil Applications (MCA-1505-2026 and MCA-1379-2026) filed by Joseph Baptista Braganza and Aldila Braganza respectively against Antonetto John A D'Souza and others. The court ordered that both applications must be heard by the original bench (Valmiki Menezes & Amit S. Jamsandekar, JJ.) that had reserved judgment on the main application, requiring that bench to be reconstituted for proper adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    For Orders - First On Board

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten S. Venegavkar

  4. 05-May-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay at Goa heard two consolidated Miscellaneous Civil Applications (MCA-1505-2026 and MCA-1379-2026) filed by Joseph Baptista Braganza and Aldila Braganza respectively against Antonetto John A D'Souza and others. The court ordered that both applications must be heard by the original bench (Valmiki Menezes & Amit S. Jamsandekar, JJ.) that had reserved judgment on the main application, requiring that bench to be reconstituted for proper adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case