AKASH MARDOLKAR PRESENTLY IN JUDICIAL CUSTODY Sahil Lavande, ,MARIA CAROLINE COLLASSO,VIJETA POULEKAR,Ambarish Abhay Gavandalkar vs UNION OF INDIA THR. OFFICER IN CHARGE AND ANR. — HCBM50017862026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Bail Granted on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM050017862026

e-Filing Number

30-04-2026

Filing Number

CRMAB/457/2026

Filing Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Dr. Justice Neela Gokhale

Coram

Hon'ble Dr. Justice Neela Gokhale

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

BAIL/INTERIM BAIL ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL SECTION

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Bail Granted

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AKASH MARDOLKAR PRESENTLY IN JUDICIAL CUSTODY Sahil Lavande, ,MARIA CAROLINE COLLASSO,VIJETA POULEKAR,Ambarish Abhay Gavandalkar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA THR. OFFICER IN CHARGE AND ANR.

  2. 2.Union of India

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Dr. Justice Neela GokhaleView PDF

  3. 08-May-2026

    For Admission - First On Board

    Hon'ble Dr. Justice Neela Gokhale

  4. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Dr. Justice Neela GokhaleView PDF

    This is a bail application hearing in the High Court of Bombay at Goa. The court adjourned the matter, directing the Deputy Solicitor General to file a reply by May 8, 2026, with an advance copy to the applicant's counsel. No substantive decision on the bail application was made at this stage; the case was merely stood over for the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 07-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 30-Apr-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

This is a bail application hearing in the High Court of Bombay at Goa. The court adjourned the matter, directing the Deputy Solicitor General to file a reply by May 8, 2026, with an advance copy to the applicant's counsel. No substantive decision on the bail application was made at this stage; the case was merely stood over for the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case