HOABL IMPACTUM LAND PVT. LTD. BY ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE vs VILLAGE PANCHAYAT OF KARAPUR-SARVAN THR. ITS SECRETARY AND 2 ORS. — HCBM50017672026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Disposed: Disposed of on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM050017672026

Filing Number

WP/1312/2026

Filing Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Dr. Justice Neela Gokhale

Coram

Hon'ble Dr. Justice Neela Gokhale

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL SECTION

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Disposed of

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227
The Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HOABL IMPACTUM LAND PVT. LTD. BY ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE

    Adv. VENKATESH AMEYA NAYAK SALATRY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VILLAGE PANCHAYAT OF KARAPUR-SARVAN THR. ITS SECRETARY AND 2 ORS.

  2. 2.THE SECRETARY VILLAGE PANCHAYAT OF KARAPUR-SARVAN

  3. 3.THE SARPANCH, VILLAGE PANCHAYAT OF KARAPUR-SARVAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Dr. Justice Neela GokhaleView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay at Goa disposed of the writ petition challenging the Village Panchayat's stop-work notice dated 28th April 2026, finding that the matter was already pending in appeal before the Additional Director of Panchayats. The court directed the Additional Director to hear both petitioner and respondents within one month, addressing the petitioner's grievance about the delayed scheduling of the appeal hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    For Admission - First On Board

    Hon'ble Dr. Justice Neela Gokhale

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay at Goa disposed of the writ petition challenging the Village Panchayat's stop-work notice dated 28th April 2026, finding that the matter was already pending in appeal before the Additional Director of Panchayats. The court directed the Additional Director to hear both petitioner and respondents within one month, addressing the petitioner's grievance about the delayed scheduling of the appeal hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case