SHARANBASU ALIAS CHEMPYA BUDDAPPA GAIKWAD DALVI ASHWIIN PANDURANG vs THE STATE OF GOA THR THE POLICE INSPECTOR, MAPUSA POLICE STATION, NORTH GOA Advocate - SWATI S KAMAT WAGH, SWATI S KAMAT WAGH (Memo Filed) — HCBM50017642026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Bail Granted on 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM050017642026
e-Filing Number
29-04-2026
Filing Number
CRMAB/452/2026
Filing Date
30-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Dr. Justice Neela Gokhale
Coram
Hon'ble Dr. Justice Neela Gokhale
Bench Type
Single
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
BAIL/INTERIM BAIL ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL SECTION
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Bail Granted
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHARANBASU ALIAS CHEMPYA BUDDAPPA GAIKWAD DALVI ASHWIIN PANDURANG
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GOA THR THE POLICE INSPECTOR, MAPUSA POLICE STATION, NORTH GOA Advocate - SWATI S KAMAT WAGH, SWATI S KAMAT WAGH (Memo Filed)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Dr. Justice Neela GokhaleView PDF
Case Summary The High Court of Bombay at Goa granted bail to Sharanbasu Alias Chempya Buddappa Gaikwad in a murder case (FIR No. 91/2024) involving a fatal group assault, finding that the injured victim's statement attributed no specific role to the applicant despite his presence at the incident. The court ordered bail on stringent conditions including a ₹50,000 bond, monthly police attendance, trial court appearances, and restrictions on leaving India or contacting witnesses, while clarifying that the observations were prima facie and confined to the bail application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
For Admission - First On Board
Hon'ble Dr. Justice Neela Gokhale
-
30-Apr-2026
Case filed
Case Summary The High Court of Bombay at Goa granted bail to Sharanbasu Alias Chempya Buddappa Gaikwad in a murder case (FIR No. 91/2024) involving a fatal group assault, finding that the injured victim's statement attributed no specific role to the applicant despite his presence at the incident. The court ordered bail on stringent conditions including a ₹50,000 bond, monthly police attendance, trial court appearances, and restrictions on leaving India or contacting witnesses, while clarifying that the observations were prima facie and confined to the bail application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts