ICICI GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD vs SONI DEVI AND ANR Advocate - NARVEKAR VIGHNESH RAMA, ,Sachin N Raul,PARIKSHIT S. SAWANT,Sachin N Raul — MCA/603/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Disposed: --Disposed of on 07th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM050015192023
Filing Number
MCA/1144/2023
Filing Date
05-Jun-2023
Registration No
MCA/603/2023
Registration Date
12-Dec-2023
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashish S. Chavan
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashish S. Chavan
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL SECTION
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--Disposed of
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ICICI GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD
Adv. JAMES LOPES
Respondent(s)
-
1.SONI DEVI AND ANR Advocate - NARVEKAR VIGHNESH RAMA, ,Sachin N Raul,PARIKSHIT S. SAWANT,Sachin N Raul
-
2.M/S KARTHIK INDUCTIONS LTD (ROLLING DIVISION)
Adv. PRASANNA C CHAWDIKAR,M. Silva MANDAR DILIP NAIK Shirodkar Harshada Damodar N. Amonkar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashish S. ChavanView PDF
Case Summary: The High Court of Bombay at Goa allowed ICICI General Insurance's application to condone a 96-day delay in filing an appeal under the Workmen's Compensation Act. The court found that the delay was attributable to internal organizational processes within the insurance company's hierarchy and was not deliberate or negligent. With the initial compensation already deposited, the court approved the condonation and permitted the appeal to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
For Orders
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashish S. Chavan
-
13-Nov-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bharat P. DeshpandeView PDF
-
10-Oct-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bharat P. DeshpandeView PDF
-
08-Aug-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bharat P. DeshpandeView PDF
-
13-Oct-2023
RegistrarView PDF
-
05-Jun-2023
Case filed
Registration No. MCA/603/2023
Case Summary: The High Court of Bombay at Goa allowed ICICI General Insurance's application to condone a 96-day delay in filing an appeal under the Workmen's Compensation Act. The court found that the delay was attributable to internal organizational processes within the insurance company's hierarchy and was not deliberate or negligent. With the initial compensation already deposited, the court approved the condonation and permitted the appeal to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts