SAMEER M MUZAWAR AND 25 ORS. vs THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PANAJI (CCP) THR. THE COMMISSIONER AND ANR. — HCBM50015112026

Case under Constitution of India Section 14,21,226. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.

Next hearing 17-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM050015112026

Filing Number

WP/1124/2026

Filing Date

17-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Dr. Justice Neela Gokhale

Coram

Hon'ble Dr. Justice Neela Gokhale

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL SECTION

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 14,21,226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAMEER M MUZAWAR AND 25 ORS.

    Adv. Smita Shashikant Gawas Alias Smita Redkar,PARIMAL SURESH REDKAR,PARIMAL SURESH REDKAR, ,PARIMAL SURESH REDKAR

  2. 2.SUNIL ASHOK JAWARE

    Adv. PARIMAL SURESH REDKAR

  3. 3.SHAHIDA ABASS MUZAWAR

    Adv. PARIMAL SURESH REDKAR

  4. 4.HUSSAIN KHAN

    Adv. PARIMAL SURESH REDKAR

  5. 5.NAGESH KRISHNA BHANDARI

    Adv. PARIMAL SURESH REDKAR

  6. 6.SIDDU KASHINATH TIVREKAR

    Adv. PARIMAL SURESH REDKAR

  7. 7.TANVIR ALAM

    Adv. PARIMAL SURESH REDKAR

  8. 8.SHAFI UMAR GODIL

    Adv. PARIMAL SURESH REDKAR

  9. 9.MUMTAZ SHAFI GODIL

    Adv. PARIMAL SURESH REDKAR

  10. 10.ABDULLAH MOHAMMED ALI BUTASHA

    Adv. PARIMAL SURESH REDKAR

  11. 11.ELIAS MOHAMAD

    Adv. PARIMAL SURESH REDKAR

  12. 12.MOHAMMAD ALI SHAIKH

    Adv. PARIMAL SURESH REDKAR

  13. 13.AMBIKA KESHAV NAIK

    Adv. PARIMAL SURESH REDKAR

  14. 14.ZUHAR AHMED MOTIWALA

    Adv. PARIMAL SURESH REDKAR

  15. 15.HAROON HABIB MOTIWALA

    Adv. PARIMAL SURESH REDKAR

  16. 16.YASMIN TAHIR KHAN

    Adv. PARIMAL SURESH REDKAR

  17. 17.TAUFIK MALLICK

    Adv. PARIMAL SURESH REDKAR

  18. 18.SAJID MALIK

    Adv. PARIMAL SURESH REDKAR

  19. 19.LAXMAN JAIRAM SHETGAONKAR

    Adv. PARIMAL SURESH REDKAR

  20. 20.HARE RAM SINGH

    Adv. PARIMAL SURESH REDKAR

  21. 21.ZAREENA BEGUM

    Adv. PARIMAL SURESH REDKAR

  22. 22.MOHAMAD H. DIFFI ALIAS MOHAMAD HANIF

    Adv. PARIMAL SURESH REDKAR

  23. 23.DAMU SURYA NAIK

    Adv. PARIMAL SURESH REDKAR

  24. 24.NASRIN ADMANI

    Adv. PARIMAL SURESH REDKAR

  25. 25.SUKANTI SHRIKANT DONGREKAR

    Adv. PARIMAL SURESH REDKAR

  26. 26.SMITA S. DONGREKAR

    Adv. PARIMAL SURESH REDKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PANAJI (CCP) THR. THE COMMISSIONER AND ANR.

  2. 2.THE STATE OF GOA THR. THE CHIEF SECRETARY

Case History

  1. 17-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Dr. Justice Neela GokhaleView PDF

    Case Summary The High Court of Bombay at Goa partially allowed the writ petition. The court directed the petitioners to temporarily vacate their market stalls only until the adjacent municipal building demolition is complete, rejecting the Corporation's attempt to permanently displace them. The court clarified that temporary vacation for safety during demolition does not confer permanent rights on the Corporation and that petitioners' earlier legal claims remain unaffected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    For Admission - First On Board

    Hon'ble Dr. Justice Neela Gokhale

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The High Court of Bombay at Goa partially allowed the writ petition. The court directed the petitioners to temporarily vacate their market stalls only until the adjacent municipal building demolition is complete, rejecting the Corporation's attempt to permanently displace them. The court clarified that temporary vacation for safety during demolition does not confer permanent rights on the Corporation and that petitioners' earlier legal claims remain unaffected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case