EDCON REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS REP. BY ITS PARTNER vs THE GOA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY THR. ITS CHAIRPERSON — HCBM50015002026

Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Next hearing 12-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM050015002026

e-Filing Number

16-04-2026

Filing Number

CA/1115/2026

Filing Date

16-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit S. Jamsandekar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit S. Jamsandekar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL SECTION

Last updated 28-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.EDCON REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS REP. BY ITS PARTNER

    Adv. RYAN DA PIEDADE MENEZES

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE GOA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY THR. ITS CHAIRPERSON

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit S. Jamsandekar

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit S. JamsandekarView PDF

    Case Summary EDCON REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS v. GOA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY The High Court of Bombay at Goa admitted EDCON's second appeal challenging a Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal order dated 10.04.2026. The appeal raises substantial questions regarding whether the Tribunal had jurisdiction to determine if a 01.02.2020 agreement between the developer and land-owners required registration under the Registration Act, and whether such registration obligations apply to developer-owner agreements beyond allottee agreements. The matter has been listed for final hearing as per its turn, with no interim relief sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 23-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit S. JamsandekarView PDF

  5. 23-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit S. JamsandekarView PDF

  7. 16-Apr-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary EDCON REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS v. GOA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY The High Court of Bombay at Goa admitted EDCON's second appeal challenging a Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal order dated 10.04.2026. The appeal raises substantial questions regarding whether the Tribunal had jurisdiction to determine if a 01.02.2020 agreement between the developer and land-owners required registration under the Registration Act, and whether such registration obligations apply to developer-owner agreements beyond allottee agreements. The matter has been listed for final hearing as per its turn, with no interim relief sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case