JANARDHAN GOVIND PALNI vs STATE OF GOA, THR. ITS CHIEF SECRETARY AND 6 ORS — WP/353/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Withdrawn on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM050014542025

Filing Number

WP/1079/2025

Filing Date

15-Apr-2025

Registration No

WP/353/2025

Registration Date

09-Sep-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes , Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit S. Jamsandekar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes , Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit S. Jamsandekar

Bench Type

Division

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL SECTION

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Withdrawn

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
The Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JANARDHAN GOVIND PALNI

    Adv. DEEPAK GAONKAR,AKHIL DEELIP GOVENKAR,AKHIL DEELIP GOVENKAR, ,Sawardekar Harsh Gautam,AKHIL DEELIP GOVENKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GOA, THR. ITS CHIEF SECRETARY AND 6 ORS

  2. 2.OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR AND SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE AND INCHARGE OF THE DEMOLITION SQUAD

    Adv. BHAT AKSHATA NITIN

  3. 3.THE DIRECTOR

    Adv. BHAT AKSHATA NITIN

  4. 4.THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER

    Adv. BHAT AKSHATA NITIN

  5. 5.VILLAGE PANCHAYAT PARCEM THR. ITS SECRETARY

  6. 6.SUMANVATI NAMDEV PALNI

  7. 7.PRADEEP RAGHUNATH PARCEKAR DESAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes,hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten S. VenegavkarView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay at Goa found compliance with its previous order of 04.05.2026 directing disciplinary action against the Secretary of Village Panchayat of Parsem. The Director of Panchayats initiated proceedings, resulting in the Secretary being censured and issued a memo. The court closed the case as no further proceedings were required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes,hon'ble Shri Justice Amit S. JamsandekarView PDF

  4. 04-May-2026

    For Admission - After Notice

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes , Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit S. Jamsandekar

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes,hon'ble Shri Justice Amit S. JamsandekarView PDF

  6. 30-Mar-2026

    For Admission - After Notice

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes , Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit S. Jamsandekar

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes,hon'ble Shri Justice Amit S. JamsandekarView PDF

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    For Admission - After Notice

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam , Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit S. Jamsandekar

  9. 10-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam,hon'ble Shri Justice Amit S. JamsandekarView PDF

  10. 10-Feb-2026

    For Admission - After Notice

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes , Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit S. Jamsandekar

  11. 19-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes,hon'ble Shri Justice Amit S. JamsandekarView PDF

  12. 19-Jan-2026

    For Admission - After Notice

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sarang V. Kotwal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashish S. Chavan

  13. 11-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sarang V. Kotwal,hon'ble Shri Justice Ashish S. ChavanView PDF

  14. 11-Dec-2025

    For Admission - Fresh

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sarang V. Kotwal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashish S. Chavan

  15. 13-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sarang V. Kotwal,hon'ble Shri Justice Ashish S. ChavanView PDF

  16. 13-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  17. 15-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/353/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay at Goa found compliance with its previous order of 04.05.2026 directing disciplinary action against the Secretary of Village Panchayat of Parsem. The Director of Panchayats initiated proceedings, resulting in the Secretary being censured and issued a memo. The court closed the case as no further proceedings were required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case