SR. M SNEHALA AC vs KASHINATH JAIRAM SHETYE AND 2 ORS. — HCBM50014082026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.

Next hearing 02-Jul-2026

CNR: HCBM050014082026

Filing Number

WP/1045/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Dr. Justice Neela Gokhale

Coram

Hon'ble Dr. Justice Neela Gokhale

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL SECTION

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227
Right to Information Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SR. M SNEHALA AC

    Adv. J. ABREU LOBO,Manerkar Manjeeta Xivaprasad,Manerkar Manjeeta Xivaprasad, ,Akshaya Ashok Nanodkar,Manerkar Manjeeta Xivaprasad

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KASHINATH JAIRAM SHETYE AND 2 ORS.

  2. 2.THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY

  3. 3.STATE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER

Case History

  1. 02-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-Jul-2026

    For Admission - After Notice

    Hon'ble Dr. Justice Neela Gokhale

  3. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Dr. Justice Neela GokhaleView PDF

    Case Summary The High Court of Bombay at Goa stayed a State Information Commission order dated 16.03.2026 that directed the petitioner (PIO) to provide document inspection and certified copies to respondent no.1, along with an associated show-cause notice. The court deleted the State Information Commissioner as an unnecessary party and adjourned the case to 02.07.2026 after respondent no.1 failed to appear despite service of notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 07-May-2026

    For Admission - First On Board

    Hon'ble Dr. Justice Neela Gokhale

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Dr. Justice Neela GokhaleView PDF

  6. 09-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The High Court of Bombay at Goa stayed a State Information Commission order dated 16.03.2026 that directed the petitioner (PIO) to provide document inspection and certified copies to respondent no.1, along with an associated show-cause notice. The court deleted the State Information Commissioner as an unnecessary party and adjourned the case to 02.07.2026 after respondent no.1 failed to appear despite service of notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case