SHRI SHAMSUNDAR V.KAMAT, AT SAO PEDRO,ILHAS GOA.(Legal Heir) MR. R.G. RAMANI 1. vs STATE OF GOA THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY AND ANR., Advocate - SUSAN LINHARES, Adv. Susan Linhares for R. No. 1 and 2 (Memo filed) — FA/105/2006
Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Next hearing: 12th January 2007.
CNR: HCBM050010742006
Filing Number
STM/1059/2006
Filing Date
13-Apr-2006
Registration No
FA/105/2006
Registration Date
24-Apr-2006
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice S.K. Shah
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice S.K. Shah
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL SECTION
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHRI SHAMSUNDAR V.KAMAT, AT SAO PEDRO,ILHAS GOA.(Legal Heir) MR. R.G. RAMANI 1.
-
2.RUKMA KAMAT1.
-
3.MR. VASSUDEV KAMAT1.
-
4.SACHI VASSUDEV KAMAT1.
-
5.MR. SANAT KAMAT1.
-
6.MRS. ADITI KAMAT
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GOA THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY AND ANR., Advocate - SUSAN LINHARES, Adv. Susan Linhares for R. No. 1 and 2 (Memo filed)
-
2.CAPTAIN OF PORTS
Case History
-
12-Jan-2007
Next hearingPending
-
07-May-2026
RegistrarView PDF
Case Summary: FA 105/2006 In First Appeal No. 105 of 2006 before the High Court of Bombay at Goa, the court issued a Registrar's Order on 7th May, 2026. The case was adjourned after vacation. Notice was issued to respondents' counsel as records may need to be created. The appellant submitted documents via paperbook, and respondents were given opportunity to furnish any relevant documents in their possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Sep-2025
RegistrarView PDF
-
31-Jul-2025
RegistrarView PDF
-
26-Jun-2025
RegistrarView PDF
-
12-Jun-2025
RegistrarView PDF
-
12-Jan-2007
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice S.K. Shah
-
21-Jul-2006
Hon'ble Shri Justice V.C. DagaView PDF
-
21-Jul-2006
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Apr-2006
Case filed
Registration No. FA/105/2006
Case Summary: FA 105/2006 In First Appeal No. 105 of 2006 before the High Court of Bombay at Goa, the court issued a Registrar's Order on 7th May, 2026. The case was adjourned after vacation. Notice was issued to respondents' counsel as records may need to be created. The appellant submitted documents via paperbook, and respondents were given opportunity to furnish any relevant documents in their possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts