M/S EMTEX ENGINEERING PVT. LTD THR ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY MS. SWATI GUPTA RIVANKAR SAGAR BHALCHANDRA, ,VLEDSON LUCIO BRAGANZA,BERNARD FERNANDES,SAGAR B. RIVANKAR,VILAS GOVINDAN PAVITHRAN,Phadte Pancham Ramchandra,Volvoikar Jeet Jayant,SIDDHANT KARPE vs VEDANTA LIMITED — HCBM50010502026

Case under Arbitration Act Section 11(4). Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM050010502026

Next Hearing

25th June 2026

e-Filing Number

16-03-2026

Filing Number

AAR/776/2026

Filing Date

16-03-2026

Judge

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE NEELA GOKHALE

Coram

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE NEELA GOKHALE

Bench Type

Single

Category

ARBITRATION ( 4 )

Sub-Category

APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATORS ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL SECTION

Acts & Sections

ARBITRATION ACT Section 11(4)

Petitioner(s)

M/S EMTEX ENGINEERING PVT. LTD THR ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY MS. SWATI GUPTA RIVANKAR SAGAR BHALCHANDRA, ,VLEDSON LUCIO BRAGANZA,BERNARD FERNANDES,SAGAR B. RIVANKAR,VILAS GOVINDAN PAVITHRAN,Phadte Pancham Ramchandra,Volvoikar Jeet Jayant,SIDDHANT KARPE

Respondent(s)

VEDANTA LIMITED

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE NEELA GOKHALE

17-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION - FIRST ON BOARD

06-05-2026

FOR ADMISSION - FIRST ON BOARD

25-06-2026

FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE

Orders

06-05-2026
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE NEELA GOKHALE

Summary: In this Application for Appointment of Arbitrator before the High Court of Bombay at Goa, the case was adjourned to 25th June, 2026. The applicant (Emtex Engineering Pvt. Ltd.) was directed to pay the requisite process fee, clear office objections, and pay court fees to enable the Registry to issue notice to the respondent (Vedanta Limited). The matter stands over pending compliance with these procedural requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In this Application for Appointment of Arbitrator before the High Court of Bombay at Goa, the case was adjourned to 25th June, 2026. The applicant (Emtex Engineering Pvt. Ltd.) was directed to pay the requisite process fee, clear office objections, and pay court fees to enable the Registry to issue notice to the respondent (Vedanta Limited). The matter stands over pending compliance with these procedural requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case