SHANTI GAJANAN KERKAR AND ANR.,(Legal Heir) vs RAMCHANDRA NAIK AND 7 ORS., Advocate - ABHIJEET KAMAT, ,PREETAM TALAULIKAR,SIMOES KHER CEAZER JOHN,SAICHA DESSAI,SAICHA DESSAI — SA/94/2013

Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM050006672013

Filing Number

STM/655/2013

Filing Date

07-Mar-2013

Registration No

SA/94/2013

Registration Date

26-Jul-2013

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL SECTION

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHANTI GAJANAN KERKAR AND ANR.,(Legal Heir)

    Adv. VILAS P. THALI 1.

  2. 2.SHRAMATA GAJANAN KERKAR

  3. 3.MR. GAJANAN SHANKAR KERKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMCHANDRA NAIK AND 7 ORS., Advocate - ABHIJEET KAMAT, ,PREETAM TALAULIKAR,SIMOES KHER CEAZER JOHN,SAICHA DESSAI,SAICHA DESSAI

  2. 2.MRS. ROSHAN NAIK

    Adv. ABHIJEET KAMAT,PREETAM TALAULIKAR SIMOES KHER CEAZER JOHN SAICHA DESSAI

  3. 3.MR. SUHAS NAIK

  4. 4.MRS. SONUBAI NAIK

    Adv. ABHIJEET KAMAT,PREETAM TALAULIKAR SIMOES KHER CEAZER JOHN NAIK DESSAI SAICHA SANJIVA

  5. 5.MRS. NANDA NAMDEV NAIK

    Adv. ABHIJEET KAMAT,PREETAM TALAULIKAR SIMOES KHER CEAZER JOHN NAIK DESSAI SAICHA SANJIVA

  6. 6.ROGULO NAIK

    Adv. ABHIJEET KAMAT,PREETAM TALAULIKAR SIMOES KHER CEAZER JOHN NAIK DESSAI SAICHA SANJIVA

  7. 7.NASIMA NAIK

    Adv. ABHIJEET KAMAT,PREETAM TALAULIKAR NAIK DESSAI SAICHA SANJIVA SIMOES KHER CEAZER JOHN

  8. 8.GANGABAI NAIK (SINCE DECEASED)

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-May-2026

    RegistrarView PDF

    Case Summary: SA 94/2013 The High Court of Bombay at Goa adjourned Second Appeal No. 94 of 2013 (Shanti Gajanan Kerkar v. Ramchandra Naik) due to procedural delays including non-payment of postal charges and failure to supply copies for serving legal representatives of Respondent No. 1. The matter was scheduled to be heard after the court vacation, with the first opportunity granted to both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Nov-2024

    Hon'ble Ms Justice Nivedita P. MehtaView PDF

  4. 16-Aug-2024

    For Final Hearing - First On Board

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik

  5. 20-Jun-2024

    For Final Hearing - High On Board

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Sonak

  6. 26-Apr-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. SonakView PDF

  7. 25-Apr-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. SonakView PDF

  8. 25-Apr-2024

    For Final Hearing - High On Board

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Sonak

  9. 05-Apr-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. SonakView PDF

  10. 28-Mar-2024

    For Final Hearing - High On Board

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Sonak

  11. 11-Dec-2014

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice F. M. Reis

  12. 05-Dec-2014

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice F. M. Reis

  13. 26-Nov-2014

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice U. V. Bakre

  14. 10-Jan-2014

    Hon'ble Shri Justice U. V. BakreView PDF

  15. 10-Jan-2014

    For Admission - Fresh

    Hon'ble Shri Justice U. V. Bakre

  16. 11-Dec-2013

    For Admission - Fresh

    Hon'ble Shri Justice U. V. Bakre

  17. 20-Nov-2013

    For Admission - Fresh

    Hon'ble Shri Justice U. V. Bakre

  18. 13-Nov-2013

    For Admission - Fresh

    Hon'ble Shri Justice U. V. Bakre

  19. 09-Oct-2013

    For Admission - Fresh

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Savant

  20. 03-Oct-2013

    For Admission - Fresh

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Savant

  21. 04-Sep-2013

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 12-Jul-2013

    RegistrarView PDF

  23. 05-Jul-2013

    RegistrarView PDF

  24. 14-Jun-2013

    RegistrarView PDF

  25. 07-Mar-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. SA/94/2013

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SA 94/2013 The High Court of Bombay at Goa adjourned Second Appeal No. 94 of 2013 (Shanti Gajanan Kerkar v. Ramchandra Naik) due to procedural delays including non-payment of postal charges and failure to supply copies for serving legal representatives of Respondent No. 1. The matter was scheduled to be heard after the court vacation, with the first opportunity granted to both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case