MENINO FERNANDES vs THE SECRETARY/ SARPANCH, VILLAGE PANCHAYAT OF MAJORDA AND ANR Advocate - NIGEL DA COSTA FRIAS, ,VISHAL SAWANT,Nishad Sonadevi Rammilan — WP/394/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,AND,227. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 10th October 2025.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM050002932024

e-Filing Number

22-01-2024

Filing Number

WP/206/2024

Filing Date

22-Jan-2024

Registration No

WP/394/2025

Registration Date

13-Oct-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL SECTION

Decision Date

10-Oct-2025

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,AND,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MENINO FERNANDES

    Adv. Valadares Mark Alvaro De Barros,Kyle Nathan Dsouza,Kyle Nathan Dsouza, ,Dsouza Alphy Pascoal Hendry,FRANCO COBURN FREDDIE JOSEPH,Kyle Nathan Dsouza

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE SECRETARY/ SARPANCH, VILLAGE PANCHAYAT OF MAJORDA AND ANR Advocate - NIGEL DA COSTA FRIAS, ,VISHAL SAWANT,Nishad Sonadevi Rammilan

  2. 2.MR. ROUSSEAU RODRIGUES

    Adv. PRASHEEN LOTLIKAR,Lotlikar Bhavesh Bhasker Naik Ronak Baburao

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Dr. Justice Neela GokhaleView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/394/2025 The High Court of Bombay at Goa disposed of the writ petition after the Village Panchayat of Majorda submitted a compliance report confirming removal of unauthorised structures (chairs, tables, and umbrellas) placed by petitioner Menino Fernandes on premises without permission. While acknowledging the complainant's concern about repeated unauthorized occupation, the court directed the Panchayat to remain vigilant in keeping the premises free from obstruction or unauthorised construction going forward. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Dr. Justice Neela GokhaleView PDF

  4. 20-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki MenezesView PDF

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki MenezesView PDF

  6. 15-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki MenezesView PDF

  7. 22-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki MenezesView PDF

  8. 15-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki MenezesView PDF

  9. 15-Dec-2025

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes

  10. 10-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki MenezesView PDF

  11. 10-Oct-2025

    For Admission - After Notice

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes

  12. 26-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki MenezesView PDF

  13. 26-Sep-2025

    For Admission - After Notice

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes

  14. 22-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki MenezesView PDF

  15. 10-Apr-2024

    For Admission - After Notice

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Avinash G. Gharote

  16. 27-Mar-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Avinash G. GharoteView PDF

  17. 27-Mar-2024

    For Admission - After Notice

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Avinash G. Gharote

  18. 06-Mar-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Avinash G. GharoteView PDF

  19. 06-Mar-2024

    For Admission - First On Board

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bharat P. Deshpande

  20. 14-Feb-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bharat P. DeshpandeView PDF

  21. 14-Feb-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 22-Jan-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/394/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/394/2025 The High Court of Bombay at Goa disposed of the writ petition after the Village Panchayat of Majorda submitted a compliance report confirming removal of unauthorised structures (chairs, tables, and umbrellas) placed by petitioner Menino Fernandes on premises without permission. While acknowledging the complainant's concern about repeated unauthorized occupation, the court directed the Panchayat to remain vigilant in keeping the premises free from obstruction or unauthorised construction going forward. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case