AADDHYAA SEEDS PVT LTD THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED PERSON RAJESH DYNADEORAO GANJARE KABIR JHAMB, ,MANMOHAN D. SARDA,A.H. MISHRA,KABIR RAJ JHAMB vs HARIYALI KRUSHI KENDRA THROUGH ITS PROPRITOR ARUNRAO TAYDE Advocate - DEEPANSHU VERMA, ,BHUPESH L. PATEL,SARANG UTTAMRAO NIKHADE — WP/1061/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.

Next hearing 21-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM040406122025

e-Filing Number

23-12-2025

Filing Number

WP/11236/2025

Filing Date

23-Dec-2025

Registration No

WP/1061/2025

Registration Date

23-Dec-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AADDHYAA SEEDS PVT LTD THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED PERSON RAJESH DYNADEORAO GANJARE KABIR JHAMB, ,MANMOHAN D. SARDA,A.H. MISHRA,KABIR RAJ JHAMB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HARIYALI KRUSHI KENDRA THROUGH ITS PROPRITOR ARUNRAO TAYDE Advocate - DEEPANSHU VERMA, ,BHUPESH L. PATEL,SARANG UTTAMRAO NIKHADE

Case History

  1. 21-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. NerlikarView PDF

    Court Order Summary Outcome: The Criminal Writ Petition was allowed. The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) quashed and set aside the trial court's order returning the cheque dishonor complaint under Section 224 of BNSS, and directed the trial court to resume proceedings from the stage prior to that order. The court reasoned that since the trial had progressed to near-completion (all evidence recorded, only final arguments pending), returning the case at this "fag end" was improper despite jurisdictional issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Petition For Admission After Notice (Criminal Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. NerlikarView PDF

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    Petition For Admission After Notice (Criminal Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar

  6. 26-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. NerlikarView PDF

  7. 26-Mar-2026

    Petition For Admission After Notice (Criminal Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. NerlikarView PDF

  9. 10-Mar-2026

    Petition For Admission After Notice (Criminal Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar

  10. 27-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. NerlikarView PDF

  11. 27-Feb-2026

    Petition For Admission After Notice (Criminal Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar

  12. 26-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. NerlikarView PDF

  13. 26-Feb-2026

    Petition For Admission After Notice (Criminal Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar

  14. 17-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. NerlikarView PDF

  15. 17-Feb-2026

    Petitions For Orders (Criminal Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar

  16. 03-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. NerlikarView PDF

  17. 03-Feb-2026

    Petitions For Orders (Criminal Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar

  18. 17-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. NerlikarView PDF

  19. 15-Jan-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh (Criminal Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar

  20. 08-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  21. 24-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. NerlikarView PDF

  22. 23-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/1061/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Outcome: The Criminal Writ Petition was allowed. The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) quashed and set aside the trial court's order returning the cheque dishonor complaint under Section 224 of BNSS, and directed the trial court to resume proceedings from the stage prior to that order. The court reasoned that since the trial had progressed to near-completion (all evidence recorded, only final arguments pending), returning the case at this "fag end" was improper despite jurisdictional issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case