RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., THR. ITS BRANCH MANAGER, NAGPUR vs PAYAL AMOL LAKHANDE AND OTHERS Advocate - YASH SUNIL SODHI — CAF/4783/2025

Case under Other Act Section 00. Disposed: Contested--Disposed-Off on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 13-Jan-2026

CNR: HCBM040402222025

Filing Number

CAF/29094/2025

Filing Date

22-Dec-2025

Registration No

CAF/4783/2025

Registration Date

22-Dec-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Yanshivraj Gopichand Khobragade

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Yanshivraj Gopichand Khobragade

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed-Off

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Other Act Section 00

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., THR. ITS BRANCH MANAGER, NAGPUR

    Adv. AMIT M. KUKDAY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PAYAL AMOL LAKHANDE AND OTHERS Advocate - YASH SUNIL SODHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Yanshivraj Gopichand KhobragadeView PDF

    Summary of CAF No. 4783/2025 The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) permitted the dependents of deceased Amol Suryabhan Lokhande to withdraw Rs. 25,41,397/- compensation awarded in a motor accident claims case, despite Reliance General Insurance's opposition. The court allowed withdrawal of 50% of respective shares on undertaking and 25% on surety with accrued interest, balancing the claimants' financial needs against the insurance company's recovery concerns. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Jan-2026

    —

  4. 22-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CAF/4783/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CAF No. 4783/2025 The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) permitted the dependents of deceased Amol Suryabhan Lokhande to withdraw Rs. 25,41,397/- compensation awarded in a motor accident claims case, despite Reliance General Insurance's opposition. The court allowed withdrawal of 50% of respective shares on undertaking and 25% on surety with accrued interest, balancing the claimants' financial needs against the insurance company's recovery concerns. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case