RAJKUMAR S/O LADHARAM ISRANI AND ANR vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO., JARIPATKA PS, NAGPUR — ABA/970/2025

Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 438. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 23-Dec-2025

CNR: HCBM040400822025

Filing Number

ABA/11084/2025

Filing Date

20-Dec-2025

Registration No

ABA/970/2025

Registration Date

22-Dec-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajnish R. Vyas

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajnish R. Vyas

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

ANTICIPATORY BAIL ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 438
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482(1)
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(2),318(4),316(2),351(3),296

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJKUMAR S/O LADHARAM ISRANI AND ANR

    Adv. BHUSHAN D. SACHDEV,DIPENN S. JAGYASI,DIPENN S. JAGYASI, ,PARAG VIDHANI,DIPENN S. JAGYASI

  2. 2.SMT. REKHA W/O RAJKUMAR ISRANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO., JARIPATKA PS (Police Station), NAGPUR

    Adv. ,AWADHOOT T. PUROHIT,TUFEL YASIN SHARIF,SUMITI S. OZA,ADV. FOR COMPLAINANT 1123

  2. 2.UDAY S/O PRALHAD SETIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajnish R. VyasView PDF

    Case Summary: ABA/970/2025 Decision: The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) allowed the anticipatory bail application filed by Rajkumar and Rekha Israni, confirming the ad-interim bail granted on 23/12/2025. The court found that while the applicants received ₹1.98 crore from the informant on the pretext of investment returns, no prima facie evidence demonstrated fraudulent intent at the outset, and the dispute appears primarily commercial in nature rather than criminal. Key Reasoning: The FIR was filed 2.5 years after the last transaction; the applicants voluntarily cooperated by attending police station 33 times; and only ₹38 lakh remained unreturned. The court noted the absence of evidence showing initial fraudulent intention and characterized the matter as suitable for civil resolution, not criminal prosecution. Conditions: Bail bond of ₹25,000 each with surety; attendance as required; no evidence tampering or witness influence; no leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Aba (After Notice)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajnish R. Vyas

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajnish R. VyasView PDF

  5. 17-Apr-2026

    Aba (After Notice)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajnish R. Vyas

  6. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajnish R. VyasView PDF

  7. 16-Apr-2026

    For Orders - (Criminal Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. Chandwani

  8. 06-Apr-2026

    For Orders (At 2.30 pm) (Criminal Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. Chandwani

  9. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. ChandwaniView PDF

  10. 23-Mar-2026

    For Orders (At 2.30 pm) (Criminal Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. Chandwani

  11. 17-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. ChandwaniView PDF

  12. 17-Mar-2026

    For Orders (At 2.30 pm) (Criminal Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. Chandwani

  13. 05-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. ChandwaniView PDF

  14. 05-Mar-2026

    For Orders (At 2.30 pm) (Criminal Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. Chandwani

  15. 23-Feb-2026

    For Orders (At 2.30 pm) (Criminal Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. Chandwani

  16. 09-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. ChandwaniView PDF

  17. 09-Feb-2026

    For Orders (At 2.30 pm) (Criminal Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. Chandwani

  18. 28-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. ChandwaniView PDF

  19. 28-Jan-2026

    For Orders (At 2.30 pm) (Criminal Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. Chandwani

  20. 21-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. ChandwaniView PDF

  21. 21-Jan-2026

    For Orders (At 2.30 pm) (Criminal Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. Chandwani

  22. 09-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. ChandwaniView PDF

  23. 09-Jan-2026

    Ba (Fresh)

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Vrushali V. Joshi

  24. 23-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Vrushali V. JoshiView PDF

  25. 23-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 20-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. ABA/970/2025

  27. 11-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash MehtaView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ABA/970/2025 Decision: The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) allowed the anticipatory bail application filed by Rajkumar and Rekha Israni, confirming the ad-interim bail granted on 23/12/2025. The court found that while the applicants received ₹1.98 crore from the informant on the pretext of investment returns, no prima facie evidence demonstrated fraudulent intent at the outset, and the dispute appears primarily commercial in nature rather than criminal. Key Reasoning: The FIR was filed 2.5 years after the last transaction; the applicants voluntarily cooperated by attending police station 33 times; and only ₹38 lakh remained unreturned. The court noted the absence of evidence showing initial fraudulent intention and characterized the matter as suitable for civil resolution, not criminal prosecution. Conditions: Bail bond of ₹25,000 each with surety; attendance as required; no evidence tampering or witness influence; no leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case