SIDDHANT DALUJI DHONE vs NIRMAL AGENCY, THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR, NAGPUR Advocate - PRUTHVIRAJ SHYAM CHAWHAN, ,HARSHWARDHAN CHAWHAN,KUSHAL V. KUMAR,(FOR RESPONDENT) — WP/1229/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM040396922025

Next Hearing

18th June 2026

Filing Number

WP/28738/2025

Filing Date

17-12-2025

Registration No

WP/1229/2026

Registration Date

07-02-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227
Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act (Maharashtra) Section ---
Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 Section ---
M.R.T.U. & P.U.L.P. Act Section ---

Petitioner(s)

SIDDHANT DALUJI DHONE

Adv. RANJAN N. DESHPANDE,AASAVARI S KALE,AASAVARI S KALE, ,AASAVARI S KALE

Respondent(s)

NIRMAL AGENCY, THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR, NAGPUR Advocate - PRUTHVIRAJ SHYAM CHAWHAN, ,HARSHWARDHAN CHAWHAN,KUSHAL V. KUMAR,(FOR RESPONDENT)

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR

24-02-2026
18-06-2026

FOR ADMISSION-LABOUR AND INDUSTRIAL

06-05-2026

FOR ADMISSION-LABOUR AND INDUSTRIAL

04-05-2026

FOR ADMISSION-LABOUR AND INDUSTRIAL

27-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION-LABOUR AND INDUSTRIAL

Orders

06-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR

Case Summary: WP/1229/2026 - Siddhant Daluji Dhone vs. Nirmal Agency, Nagpur On 06.05.2026, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, adjourned the case. The respondent's counsel was granted time to file an affidavit-in-reply, and the matter was stood over for hearing after the Summer Vacation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/1229/2026 - Siddhant Daluji Dhone vs. Nirmal Agency, Nagpur On 06.05.2026, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, adjourned the case. The respondent's counsel was granted time to file an affidavit-in-reply, and the matter was stood over for hearing after the Summer Vacation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case