BHUJANGRAO @ SANTOSH S/O MADHAVRAO THAKRE vs JOINT DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION, AMRAVATI DIVISION, AMRAVATI AND OTHERS — WP/8151/2025

Case under Maharashtra Public Universities Act, 2016(Mah. Act No. Vi of 2017) Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 26th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 01-Jan-2026

CNR: HCBM040395332025

Filing Number

WP/28597/2025

Filing Date

17-Dec-2025

Registration No

WP/8151/2025

Registration Date

17-Dec-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

26-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Public Universities Act, 2016(Mah. Act No. Vi of 2017) Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHUJANGRAO @ SANTOSH S/O MADHAVRAO THAKRE

    Adv. ANUP SHANKAR DHORE,YASH SANJAY BANGALE,YASH SANJAY BANGALE, ,YASH SANJAY BANGALE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JOINT DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION, AMRAVATI DIVISION, AMRAVATI AND OTHERS

    Adv. ,SHRIKANT D. SONGADE,SALIL MILIND GAIDHANE,MAHRUKH ZEESHAN HAQ,ZEESHAN Z. HAQ,PRUTHVIRAJ SHYAM CHAWHAN,HARSHWARDHAN CHAWHAN,(FOR R

  2. 2.1123

  3. 3.SANT GADGEBABA AMRAVATI VIDYAPEETH (UNIVERSITY), AMRAVATI, THR. REGISTRAR

  4. 4.SANT GADGE MAHARAJ VIDYALAYA MANDAL, AKOLA, THR. PRESIDENT/ SECRETARY

  5. 5.DR. RITA TUSHAR DESHMUKH

  6. 6.DR. SACHIN SHIVDAS MATUDE

  7. 7.DR. NITIN SHIVDAS SATPUTE

  8. 8.AKSHAY KESHAVPRASAD CHAUHAN

  9. 9.DILIP DYANOBAJI SHAHADE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare,hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash MehtaView PDF

    Summary: The Bombay High Court's Nagpur Bench dismissed a writ petition filed by Dr. Bhujangrao Thakre, a college principal, who challenged an order constituting a committee to verify his date of birth. After school documents (transfer certificate, leaving certificate, and SSC board certificate) consistently showed his date of birth as 1/10/1962 rather than his claimed 1/10/1964, the petitioner tendered an apology to the court and accepted the correct date of birth as recorded in his school records. The petition was disposed of as withdrawn with the petitioner's consent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    For Admission - Circulated Matters (Civil Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta

  4. 04-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare,hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash MehtaView PDF

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    For Orders- CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta

  6. 22-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare,hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash MehtaView PDF

  7. 16-Jan-2026

    Fresh Admission (Civil Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajnish R. Vyas

  8. 12-Jan-2026

    Fresh Admission (Civil Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

  9. 01-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 23-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF

  11. 18-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Rajnish R. VyasView PDF

  12. 17-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/8151/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Bombay High Court's Nagpur Bench dismissed a writ petition filed by Dr. Bhujangrao Thakre, a college principal, who challenged an order constituting a committee to verify his date of birth. After school documents (transfer certificate, leaving certificate, and SSC board certificate) consistently showed his date of birth as 1/10/1962 rather than his claimed 1/10/1964, the petitioner tendered an apology to the court and accepted the correct date of birth as recorded in his school records. The petition was disposed of as withdrawn with the petitioner's consent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case