NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD., THR ITS BRANCH MANAGER, NAGPUR vs KARTAL S/O GHANSHAYAM SANODIYA AND OTHERS — CAF/4704/2025

Case under Limitation Act,1963 Section 05. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

Next hearing 09-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM040393962025

Filing Number

CAF/28494/2025

Filing Date

16-Dec-2025

Registration No

CAF/4704/2025

Registration Date

18-Dec-2025

Judge

Registrar (Judicial)

Coram

Registrar (Judicial)

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act,1963 Section 05

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD., THR ITS BRANCH MANAGER, NAGPUR

    Adv. S.H. BHATIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KARTAL S/O GHANSHAYAM SANODIYA AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. 09-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    For Orders -

    Registrar (Judicial)

  3. 05-May-2026

    Registrar (Judicial)View PDF

    Case Summary: Civil Application in First Appeal No. 4704 of 2025 before the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) involving New India Assurance Company Ltd. versus Kartal S/o Ghanshayam Sanodiya and Others was heard on 5th May, 2026. The case was adjourned with a "Stand Over" order after vacation, with counsel for the appellant present. No substantive order on merits was passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    For Orders -

    Registrar (Judicial)

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Registrar (Judicial)View PDF

  6. 29-Jan-2026

    For Orders-Lar Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar

  7. 13-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 19-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. KhubalkarView PDF

  9. 16-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CAF/4704/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Civil Application in First Appeal No. 4704 of 2025 before the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) involving New India Assurance Company Ltd. versus Kartal S/o Ghanshayam Sanodiya and Others was heard on 5th May, 2026. The case was adjourned with a "Stand Over" order after vacation, with counsel for the appellant present. No substantive order on merits was passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case