AMOL BABURAO WANKAR vs NIRMAL AGENCY, THR. PROPRIETOR, NAGPUR — WP/581/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM040390182025

Next Hearing

18th June 2026

Filing Number

WP/28225/2025

Filing Date

11-12-2025

Registration No

WP/581/2026

Registration Date

20-01-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227
Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act (Maharashtra) Section ---
M.R.T.U. & P.U.L.P. Act Section ---
Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 Section ---

Petitioner(s)

AMOL BABURAO WANKAR

Adv. RANJAN N. DESHPANDE,AASAVARI S KALE,AASAVARI S KALE, ,AASAVARI S KALE

Respondent(s)

NIRMAL AGENCY, THR. PROPRIETOR, NAGPUR

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR

04-02-2026
18-06-2026

FOR ADMISSION-LABOUR AND INDUSTRIAL

06-05-2026

FOR ADMISSION-LABOUR AND INDUSTRIAL

04-05-2026

FOR ADMISSION-LABOUR AND INDUSTRIAL

27-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION-LABOUR AND INDUSTRIAL

Orders

06-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR

Case Summary: WP 581/2026 On 06.05.2026, the High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench heard WP 581/2026 (Amol Baburao Wankar vs. Nirmal Agency) along with 19 consolidated petitions. The respondent's counsel sought time to file an affidavit-in-reply, which was granted. The case was adjourned to be heard after Summer Vacation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 581/2026 On 06.05.2026, the High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench heard WP 581/2026 (Amol Baburao Wankar vs. Nirmal Agency) along with 19 consolidated petitions. The respondent's counsel sought time to file an affidavit-in-reply, which was granted. The case was adjourned to be heard after Summer Vacation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case