MAKHDUM MEHABOOB SHEIKH (DEAD) AND OTHERS vs HIKMAT ULLA ATKARI ULLA AND OTHERS — CAF/917/2026

Case under Limitation Act,1963 Section 05. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

Next hearing 10-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM040377242025

Filing Number

CAF/27277/2025

Filing Date

01-Dec-2025

Registration No

CAF/917/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Yanshivraj Gopichand Khobragade

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Yanshivraj Gopichand Khobragade

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 26-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act,1963 Section 05

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAKHDUM MEHABOOB SHEIKH (DEAD) AND OTHERS

    Adv. MADHUR A. DEO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HIKMAT ULLA ATKARI ULLA AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. 10-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    For Orders-Macp Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Yanshivraj Gopichand Khobragade

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Yanshivraj Gopichand KhobragadeView PDF

    Case Summary: In CAF No.917/2026, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Nagpur Bench) heard the applicants' plea seeking condonation of 323 days delay in filing an appeal against a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal judgment dated 14/10/2024. The Court issued notice to the respondents returnable on 10th June 2026 and permitted the applicants to serve respondents via permissible private mode in addition to regular service. The matter stands adjourned pending response from the opposite party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 01-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CAF/917/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In CAF No.917/2026, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Nagpur Bench) heard the applicants' plea seeking condonation of 323 days delay in filing an appeal against a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal judgment dated 14/10/2024. The Court issued notice to the respondents returnable on 10th June 2026 and permitted the applicants to serve respondents via permissible private mode in addition to regular service. The matter stands adjourned pending response from the opposite party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case