MOHAMMAD SHAKIR ABDUL HAMEED vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. PRIN. SECRETARY, SCHOOL, EDUCATION AND SPORTS DEPT., MUMBAI AND OTHERS Advocate - ASIFUDDIN S. SIDDIQUI, (FOR R 3 AND — WP/7824/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM040350982025
Next Hearing
04th May 2026
Filing Number
WP/25485/2025
Filing Date
10-11-2025
Registration No
WP/7824/2025
Registration Date
08-12-2025
Judge
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE M. S. JAWALKAR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NANDESH SHANKARRAO DESHPANDE
Coram
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE M. S. JAWALKAR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NANDESH SHANKARRAO DESHPANDE
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MOHAMMAD SHAKIR ABDUL HAMEED
Adv. SUMIT B. GANDHE
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. PRIN. SECRETARY, SCHOOL, EDUCATION AND SPORTS DEPT., MUMBAI AND OTHERS Advocate - ASIFUDDIN S. SIDDIQUI, (FOR R 3 AND
EDUCATION OFFICER (PRIMARY), ZILLA PARISHAD, BULDHANA
NATIONAL SHIKSHAN BAHUDDESHIYA SANSTHA, THR ITS SECRETARY, BULDHANA
NATIONAL URDU PRATHAMIK AND UCCHA PRATHAMIK SHALA, THR ITS HEADMASTER, BULDHANA
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE M. S. JAWALKAR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NANDESH SHANKARRAO DESHPANDE
FOR ADMISSION - CIRCULATED MATTERS (CIVIL SIDE MATTERS)
FRESH ADMISSION-SERVICE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-12-2025 | |
| 15-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION - CIRCULATED MATTERS (CIVIL SIDE MATTERS) |
| 12-01-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION-SERVICE MATTERS |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/7824/2025 Outcome: Petition ALLOWED. The court quashed Clause 16 of the October 7, 2025 order and directed the Education Officer to grant the petitioner 40% increased grant-in-aid benefits within two months. Key Issue: A teacher at a minority education institution was denied the enhanced grant-in-aid (increased from 20% to 40%) solely because he had not passed the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET). The court held that since the school is a recognized minority institution, RTE Act provisions—including TET requirements—do not apply, making the denial illegal under Supreme Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/7824/2025 Outcome: Petition ALLOWED. The court quashed Clause 16 of the October 7, 2025 order and directed the Education Officer to grant the petitioner 40% increased grant-in-aid benefits within two months. Key Issue: A teacher at a minority education institution was denied the enhanced grant-in-aid (increased from 20% to 40%) solely because he had not passed the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET). The court held that since the school is a recognized minority institution, RTE Act provisions—including TET requirements—do not apply, making the denial illegal under Supreme Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts