SUDHIR S/O TEJPRATAP SINGH vs DINESH S/O. RAMJIVAN SINGH AND ANOTHER Advocate - SHYAM DAYARAM DEWANI, ,SAHIL S. DEWANI,AARZOO GUGLANI,SAIESHA P. HINGE,GURLEEN KAUR SAWHNEY,POONAM BHUTDA,(FOR R — WP/6961/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.

Next hearing 18-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM040349212025

Filing Number

WP/25378/2025

Filing Date

10-Nov-2025

Registration No

WP/6961/2025

Registration Date

13-Nov-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227
Code of Civil Procedure
C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUDHIR S/O TEJPRATAP SINGH

    Adv. S. M. BHANGDE,BALI MANOJ GAJANAN,BALI MANOJ GAJANAN, ,SUNIL S. SHINDE,SAKET PREMLAL MAKKAD,GAURI VINIT SHELKE,PALLAVI M. ANNEWAR,PANKAJ PRABHAKAR BHUJADE,MANOJ GAJANAN BALI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DINESH S/O. RAMJIVAN SINGH AND ANOTHER Advocate - SHYAM DAYARAM DEWANI, ,SAHIL S. DEWANI,AARZOO GUGLANI,SAIESHA P. HINGE,GURLEEN KAUR SAWHNEY,POONAM BHUTDA,(FOR R

  2. 2.RAJU S/O DHANRAJ CHAUHAN

Case History

  1. 18-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. KhubalkarView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/6961/2025 Sudhir (petitioner) challenged an appellate court order dated 08.09.2025 that allowed Dinesh Singh's (respondent) application to correct his address in the cause title of a civil appeal from "plot no.40/D/2" to "plot no.4-D/2" in Tilak Nagar, Nagpur. The High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench dismissed the writ petition, holding that the address correction was merely technical and inadvertently typed, necessary to avoid confusion and serve ends of justice, causing no prejudice to the petitioner. The court found the trial court's discretionary order was not perverse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    For Admission-Matters Under CIVIL Procedure Code

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. KhubalkarView PDF

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    For Orders-

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar

  6. 02-Apr-2026

    For Orders -

    Registrar (Judicial)

  7. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. KhubalkarView PDF

  8. 06-Mar-2026

    Registrar (Judicial)View PDF

  9. 15-Dec-2025

    Fresh Admission-Matters Under CIVIL Procedure Code

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar

  10. 25-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 14-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. KhubalkarView PDF

  12. 10-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/6961/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/6961/2025 Sudhir (petitioner) challenged an appellate court order dated 08.09.2025 that allowed Dinesh Singh's (respondent) application to correct his address in the cause title of a civil appeal from "plot no.40/D/2" to "plot no.4-D/2" in Tilak Nagar, Nagpur. The High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench dismissed the writ petition, holding that the address correction was merely technical and inadvertently typed, necessary to avoid confusion and serve ends of justice, causing no prejudice to the petitioner. The court found the trial court's discretionary order was not perverse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case