SBI GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., BRANCH NAGPUR vs ANIL S/O LAXMINARAYAN SHUKLA AND OTHERS Advocate - P. S. MIRACHE — CAF/4249/2025

Case under Other Act Section 00. Next hearing: 13th December 2025.

Next hearing 13-Dec-2025

CNR: HCBM040348962025

Filing Number

CAF/25355/2025

Filing Date

07-Nov-2025

Registration No

CAF/4249/2025

Registration Date

27-Nov-2025

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Other Act Section 00

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SBI GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., BRANCH NAGPUR

    Adv. MRUNAL NAIK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ANIL S/O LAXMINARAYAN SHUKLA AND OTHERS Advocate - P. S. MIRACHE

Case History

  1. 13-Dec-2025

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin S. PatilView PDF

    Case Summary: CAF/4249/2025 In this insurance matter, claimant Anil S/O Laxminarayan Shukla sought full withdrawal of amounts deposited by SBI General Insurance before the High Court. The insurance company opposed, contending the multiplier and future prospects award were wrongly calculated. Justice Pravin S. Patil partially allowed the application, permitting the claimant to withdraw 50% of the deposited amount subject to filing an undertaking with the Registrar (Judicial), balancing the claimant's need for survival against the company's appellate concerns. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Dec-2025

    —

  4. 07-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CAF/4249/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CAF/4249/2025 In this insurance matter, claimant Anil S/O Laxminarayan Shukla sought full withdrawal of amounts deposited by SBI General Insurance before the High Court. The insurance company opposed, contending the multiplier and future prospects award were wrongly calculated. Justice Pravin S. Patil partially allowed the application, permitting the claimant to withdraw 50% of the deposited amount subject to filing an undertaking with the Registrar (Judicial), balancing the claimant's need for survival against the company's appellate concerns. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case