SHRIRAM GEN. INSURANCE CO. LTD,JAIPUR HAVING ITS BR. OFFICE AT NAGPUR THR. ITS LEGAL OFFICER vs UMA OMPRAKASH MISHRA AND OTHERS — CAF/323/2026

Case under Other Act Section 00. Disposed: --C.A. Disposed off on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 22-Jan-2026

CNR: HCBM040346342025

Filing Number

CAF/25179/2025

Filing Date

06-Nov-2025

Registration No

CAF/323/2026

Registration Date

13-Jan-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Yanshivraj Gopichand Khobragade

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Yanshivraj Gopichand Khobragade

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--C.A. Disposed off

Last updated 26-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Other Act Section 00

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRIRAM GEN. INSURANCE CO. LTD,JAIPUR HAVING ITS BR. OFFICE AT NAGPUR THR. ITS LEGAL OFFICER

    Adv. GIRISH INDERLAL DIPWANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UMA OMPRAKASH MISHRA AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Yanshivraj Gopichand KhobragadeView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) granted Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd.'s application for refund of court fees after the insurance company's first appeal against a motor accident tribunal's award was disposed of following an amicable settlement between the parties achieved through mediation on 28/03/2025. The court held that since the dispute was settled before the mediator, the insurance company was entitled to refund of admissible court fees as permissible under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Jan-2026

  4. 06-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CAF/323/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) granted Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd.'s application for refund of court fees after the insurance company's first appeal against a motor accident tribunal's award was disposed of following an amicable settlement between the parties achieved through mediation on 28/03/2025. The court held that since the dispute was settled before the mediator, the insurance company was entitled to refund of admissible court fees as permissible under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case