VICE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, MSRTC, MUMBAI AND ANOTHER vs PRAMOD S/O PRALHAD TIDKE — WP/453/2025

Case under Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act (Maharashtra) Section 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 17th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM040341242024

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

06th February 2025

Filing Number

WP/24215/2024

Filing Date

09-12-2024

Registration No

WP/453/2025

Registration Date

23-01-2025

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

17th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act (Maharashtra) Section 227

Petitioner(s)

VICE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, MSRTC, MUMBAI AND ANOTHER

Adv. CHARPE RAMKRISHNA SADASHIVRAO,SANKET RAMKRISHNA CHARPE,SANKET RAMKRISHNA CHARPE, ,SANKET RAMKRISHNA CHARPE

MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD CORPORATION, THR. ITS DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, WARDHA DIVISION, MSRTC

Respondent(s)

PRAMOD S/O PRALHAD TIDKE

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR

06-02-2025
27-06-2025

FOR ORDERS --

27-03-2025

FOR ORDERS -

05-03-2025

FOR ORDERS -

05-03-2025

FOR ORDERS -

Orders

17-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR

The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) disposed of Writ Petition No. 453/2025 filed by MSRTC and others against Pramod S/O Pralhad Tidke as infructuous on 17.04.2026. The petition became moot after the complainant withdrew the underlying complaint, rendering the court's adjudication unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) disposed of Writ Petition No. 453/2025 filed by MSRTC and others against Pramod S/O Pralhad Tidke as infructuous on 17.04.2026. The petition became moot after the complainant withdrew the underlying complaint, rendering the court's adjudication unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case