SMT. RANJANA WD/O. CHHATRAPATI NIKHADE vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION AND SPORTS, MUMBAI AND ORS. — WP/945/2026
Case under Mah. Civil Services Pension Rules Section 226. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM040339002025
Next Hearing
24th June 2026
Filing Number
WP/24718/2025
Filing Date
27-10-2025
Registration No
WP/945/2026
Registration Date
31-01-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL L. PANSARE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJNISH R. VYAS
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL L. PANSARE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJNISH R. VYAS
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SMT. RANJANA WD/O. CHHATRAPATI NIKHADE
Adv. PRASHANT NAMDEO SHENDE
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION AND SPORTS, MUMBAI AND ORS.
ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, INDIAN AUDIT AND ACCOUNTS DEPARTMENT, NAGPUR
THE EDUCATION OFFICER (SECONDARY), ZILLA PARISHAD, NAGPUR
SANT TAJUDDIN BABA HIGHSCHOOL, WAKI, NAGPUR, THR. HEADMASTER
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL L. PANSARE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJNISH R. VYAS
FRESH ADMISSION-SERVICE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-02-2026 | |
| 24-06-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION-SERVICE MATTERS |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/945/2026 The widow of a school employee petitioned the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) seeking pensionary benefits that have been pending despite a proposal forwarded by the school to the Education Officer on 18.09.2025. The court issued notice to all respondents returnable after two weeks and directed the petitioner to serve the respondents through all permissible modes including Speed Post. The case was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/945/2026 The widow of a school employee petitioned the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) seeking pensionary benefits that have been pending despite a proposal forwarded by the school to the Education Officer on 18.09.2025. The court issued notice to all respondents returnable after two weeks and directed the petitioner to serve the respondents through all permissible modes including Speed Post. The case was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts