V.I.D.C. THR ITS EXE. ENGINEER, AMRAVATI MEDIUM PROJ DIV. (EARLIER-AMRAVATI IRRIGATION DIV) AMRAVAT vs RASHID KHA S/O KASAM KHA AND OTHERS Advocate - DHARMENDRA D. YAWLE — CAF/4466/2025

Case under Other Act Section 00. Next hearing: 23rd December 2025.

Next hearing 23-Dec-2025

CNR: HCBM040334052025

Filing Number

CAF/24298/2025

Filing Date

16-Oct-2025

Registration No

CAF/4466/2025

Registration Date

08-Dec-2025

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Other Act Section 00

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.V.I.D.C. THR ITS EXE. ENGINEER, AMRAVATI MEDIUM PROJ DIV. (EARLIER-AMRAVATI IRRIGATION DIV) AMRAVAT

    Adv. ASHWINI S ATHALYE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RASHID KHA S/O KASAM KHA AND OTHERS Advocate - DHARMENDRA D. YAWLE

Case History

  1. 23-Dec-2025

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin S. PatilView PDF

    Case Summary: CAF 4466/2025 Court: High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench Judge: Pravin S. Patil, J. | Date: 17-06-2026 The respondents-claimants sought withdrawal of Rs. 6,84,016/- deposited before the High Court and Rs. 4,62,167/- deposited before the Reference Court, citing bank indebtedness and prolonged litigation. The appellant opposed the withdrawal. The court allowed partial withdrawal: Rs. 4,62,167/- was transferred to the High Court Registry, and Rs. 6,84,016/- was permitted to be withdrawn with accrued interest subject to furnishing undertaking through Power of Attorney. A related application for stay of execution during appeal was also disposed of favorably for the respondents, given full deposit of decreetal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. GhodeswarView PDF

  4. 23-Dec-2025

    —

  5. 16-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CAF/4466/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CAF 4466/2025 Court: High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench Judge: Pravin S. Patil, J. | Date: 17-06-2026 The respondents-claimants sought withdrawal of Rs. 6,84,016/- deposited before the High Court and Rs. 4,62,167/- deposited before the Reference Court, citing bank indebtedness and prolonged litigation. The appellant opposed the withdrawal. The court allowed partial withdrawal: Rs. 4,62,167/- was transferred to the High Court Registry, and Rs. 6,84,016/- was permitted to be withdrawn with accrued interest subject to furnishing undertaking through Power of Attorney. A related application for stay of execution during appeal was also disposed of favorably for the respondents, given full deposit of decreetal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case