SUDHAKAR S/O PARASRAM GAJGHATE vs SHAKUNTALA W/O SARVADAMAN BELE AND OTHERS — HCBM40330222025

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 100.

CNR: HCBM040330222025

e-Filing Number

14-10-2025

Filing Number

SA/24025/2025

Filing Date

15-Oct-2025

Judge

Registrar (Judicial)

Coram

Registrar (Judicial)

Bench Type

Single

Category

SUITS ( 38 )

Sub-Category

OTHER ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 100

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUDHAKAR S/O PARASRAM GAJGHATE

    Adv. MANISH RAJENDRA JOHARAPURKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHAKUNTALA W/O SARVADAMAN BELE AND OTHERS

  2. 2.Shahikala Parasram Gajghate

  3. 3.Sumati Parasram Gajghate(Legal Heir)

  4. 4.Suresh Parasram Gajghate

  5. 5.Sarla Pradeep Sahare(Legal Heir)5.

  6. 6.iyanka Pradeep Sahare Alias Riyanka Krunal Meshram5.

  7. 7.Bhavesh Pradeep Sahare

Case History

  1. 08-Jun-2026

    For Orders -

    Registrar (Judicial)

  2. 07-May-2026

    Registrar (Judicial)View PDF

    Case Summary: In Second Appeal No. 24025 of 2025 before the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench), Sudhakar S/o Parasram Gajghate challenged a lower court decision against respondents Shakuntala and others. On 7th May 2026, the court adjourned the matter, granting two weeks as a final opportunity for the parties to appear and proceed, as no party was present on the hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Feb-2026

    For Orders - -

    Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 05-Feb-2026

    Registrar (Judicial)View PDF

  5. 05-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 15-Oct-2025

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In Second Appeal No. 24025 of 2025 before the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench), Sudhakar S/o Parasram Gajghate challenged a lower court decision against respondents Shakuntala and others. On 7th May 2026, the court adjourned the matter, granting two weeks as a final opportunity for the parties to appear and proceed, as no party was present on the hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case