SANJAY S/O GANPATRAO BHELAU vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO PS TIOSA DIST AMRAVATI — APL/1572/2025

Case under Prevention of Corruption Act Section 7. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

CNR: HCBM040329732025

Next Hearing

22nd June 2026

e-Filing Number

14-10-2025

Filing Number

APL/8976/2025

Filing Date

14-10-2025

Registration No

APL/1572/2025

Registration Date

14-10-2025

Judge

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE VRUSHALI V. JOSHI

Coram

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE VRUSHALI V. JOSHI

Bench Type

Division

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

QUASHING OF FIR C.R., CHARGE SHEET OR PROSECUTION ( 26 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Acts & Sections

Prevention of Corruption Act Section 7

Petitioner(s)

SANJAY S/O GANPATRAO BHELAU

Adv. VIJAY RAMCHANDRA HAMAND, ,PARVEZ W. MIRZA

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO PS (Police Station) TIOSA DIST AMRAVATI

ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU

NILESH GANESHRAO SHRIKANDE

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE VRUSHALI V. JOSHI

04-11-2025
22-06-2026

APPLICATIONS FOR ADMISSION AFTER NOTICE (CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS)

15-04-2026

APPLICATIONS FOR ADMISSION AFTER NOTICE (CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS)

03-02-2026

APPLICATIONS FOR ADMISSION AFTER NOTICE (CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS)

20-01-2026

APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - (CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS)

Orders

15-04-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE URMILA JOSHI PHALKE

Case Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) heard the criminal application on 15/04/2026. The court issued notice to the non-applicants returnable after Summer Vacations, with the APP waiving service for non-applicants 1 and 2. The court directed that if the applicant seeks adjournment, the trial court shall consider the same. The matter was adjourned pending responses to the notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) heard the criminal application on 15/04/2026. The court issued notice to the non-applicants returnable after Summer Vacations, with the APP waiving service for non-applicants 1 and 2. The court directed that if the applicant seeks adjournment, the trial court shall consider the same. The matter was adjourned pending responses to the notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case