DINESHCHANDRA S/O PRABHUDAYAL SHARMA vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO., PS PS BELTARODI NAGPUR CITY, NAGPUR — APPP/2115/2025

Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc). Disposed: --Disposed-Off on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 31-Oct-2025

CNR: HCBM040324362025

Filing Number

APPP/8792/2025

Filing Date

10-Oct-2025

Registration No

APPP/2115/2025

Registration Date

10-Oct-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed-Off

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DINESHCHANDRA S/O PRABHUDAYAL SHARMA

    Adv. BHUPESH WAMANRAO PATIL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO., PS (Police Station) PS (Police Station) BELTARODI NAGPUR CITY, NAGPUR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. NerlikarView PDF

    Case Summary: APPP/2115/2025 Decision: The High Court granted bail to Dineshchandra Prabhudayal Sharma, Managing Director of a cooperative society, in a cheating and misappropriation case involving Rs. 3.45 crore. The court found that while Rs. 16 lakhs was transferred to the applicant's account, he did not misappropriate the entire amount, and given his five-month detention and completed investigation, bail was warranted. Key Condition: The accused must post a Rs. 50,000 bond with two sureties, cannot enter the informant's jurisdiction, must maintain residential contact with police, and must attend all trial dates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 31-Oct-2025

    —

  4. 10-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. APPP/2115/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: APPP/2115/2025 Decision: The High Court granted bail to Dineshchandra Prabhudayal Sharma, Managing Director of a cooperative society, in a cheating and misappropriation case involving Rs. 3.45 crore. The court found that while Rs. 16 lakhs was transferred to the applicant's account, he did not misappropriate the entire amount, and given his five-month detention and completed investigation, bail was warranted. Key Condition: The accused must post a Rs. 50,000 bond with two sureties, cannot enter the informant's jurisdiction, must maintain residential contact with police, and must attend all trial dates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case