GHANSHYAMDAS S/O. GOPALDAS MOHTA (DEAD) THR. LRS. SMT. KAMLADEVI WD/O GHANSHYAMDAS MOHTA AND OTHERS vs THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR OF LAXMI BANK LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION), NAGPUR — CAL/10/2023

Case under Other Act Section 00. Disposed: --C.A. Disposed off on 26th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM040320572023

Filing Number

CAT/23002/2023

Filing Date

10-Nov-2023

Registration No

CAL/10/2023

Registration Date

21-Nov-2023

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

26-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--C.A. Disposed off

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Other Act Section 00

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GHANSHYAMDAS S/O. GOPALDAS MOHTA (DEAD) THR. LRS. SMT. KAMLADEVI WD/O GHANSHYAMDAS MOHTA AND OTHERS

    Adv. V. V. BHANGDE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR OF LAXMI BANK LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION), NAGPUR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) allowed the applicant's plea to remove the court receiver's name from the property card of a marble house (Sheet No.159, City Survey No.336, Nagpur) in the Laxmi Bank Limited liquidation proceedings, as the property was not required for winding-up and the Official Liquidator had no objection to its return to the owners. The court also allowed a related application requiring the applicant to add an intervenor as a respondent within three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Nov-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. CAL/10/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) allowed the applicant's plea to remove the court receiver's name from the property card of a marble house (Sheet No.159, City Survey No.336, Nagpur) in the Laxmi Bank Limited liquidation proceedings, as the property was not required for winding-up and the Official Liquidator had no objection to its return to the owners. The court also allowed a related application requiring the applicant to add an intervenor as a respondent within three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case