MADHAO S/O SHRIDHAR VICHORE vs CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Advocate - PRASHANTKUMAR SATHIANATHAN, ADV FOR R 2,AWADHOOT T. PUROHIT,TUFEL YASIN SHARIF,VEDANTI SUBHASH WAGH,VIJYETA L. VISHWAKARMA — APL/1654/2024
Case under Prevention of Communal, Anti-social and Other Dangerous Activities Act (Maharashtra) Section 528. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM040311862024
Next Hearing
21st November 2024
e-Filing Number
14-10-2024
Filing Number
APL/9205/2024
Filing Date
11-11-2024
Registration No
APL/1654/2024
Registration Date
11-11-2024
Judge
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE VRUSHALI V. JOSHI
Coram
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE VRUSHALI V. JOSHI
Bench Type
Division
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
QUASHING OF FIR C.R., CHARGE SHEET OR PROSECUTION ( 26 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MADHAO S/O SHRIDHAR VICHORE
Adv. P R AGRAWAL,ROHAN R DEO,ROHAN R DEO, ,AASTHA RAKESH SHARMA,SHREYA HARISH BHAGAT,YASHOWARDHAN N. SAMBRE,ROHAN R DEO
Respondent(s)
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Advocate - PRASHANTKUMAR SATHIANATHAN, ADV FOR R 2,AWADHOOT T. PUROHIT,TUFEL YASIN SHARIF,VEDANTI SUBHASH WAGH,VIJYETA L. VISHWAKARMA
BANK OF BARODA THR DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE VRUSHALI V. JOSHI
APPLICATIONS FOR ADMISSION AFTER NOTICE (CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS)
APPLICATIONS FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE(CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS)
APPLICATIONS FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE(CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS)
APPLICATIONS FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE(CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-11-2024 | |
| 17-04-2026 | APPLICATIONS FOR ADMISSION AFTER NOTICE (CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS) |
| 03-07-2025 | APPLICATIONS FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE(CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS) |
| 24-06-2025 | APPLICATIONS FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE(CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS) |
| 06-05-2025 | APPLICATIONS FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE(CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS) |
Orders
Case Summary: APL/1654/2024 Decision: The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) quashed the FIR and charge-sheet against chartered accountant Madhao Vichore and another accused, finding that continuation of criminal proceedings was unjustified after the borrowers settled the loan dispute with Bank of Baroda under One-Time Settlement (OTS) for Rs. 1.86 crore. The court noted the bank initiated no departmental action against the applicants and relied on Supreme Court precedent that conviction likelihood was remote when civil disputes involving bank loans are compromised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: APL/1654/2024 Decision: The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) quashed the FIR and charge-sheet against chartered accountant Madhao Vichore and another accused, finding that continuation of criminal proceedings was unjustified after the borrowers settled the loan dispute with Bank of Baroda under One-Time Settlement (OTS) for Rs. 1.86 crore. The court noted the bank initiated no departmental action against the applicants and relied on Supreme Court precedent that conviction likelihood was remote when civil disputes involving bank loans are compromised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts