(MAHA. STATE ELECTRICITY GEN. CO )MAHA. STATE POWER GENERATION CO. LTD THR. CHIEF ENGINEER, PARAS vs MAQSOODA BI SHAIKH SHABBIR AND OTHERS — HCBM40311702025
Case under Right to Fair Compensation & Transparency in Land Acquisition,rehabilitation & Resettlement Act,2013 Section 74.
CNR: HCBM040311702025
Filing Number
FA/22744/2025
Filing Date
01-Oct-2025
Judge
Registrar (Judicial)
Coram
Registrar (Judicial)
Bench Type
Single
Category
LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )
Sub-Category
COMPENSATION ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.(MAHA. STATE ELECTRICITY GEN. CO )MAHA. STATE POWER GENERATION CO. LTD THR. CHIEF ENGINEER, PARAS
Adv. GURUNATH EKNATH MOHARIR,NACHIKET G. MOHARIR,NACHIKET G. MOHARIR, ,NACHIKET G. MOHARIR
Respondent(s)
-
1.MAQSOODA BI SHAIKH SHABBIR AND OTHERS
-
2.RAFIQA BEE IRFANULLA KHAN
-
3.FAIMIDA VI IRFANULLA KHAN
-
4.SHAFIKA BI TAHER KHAN
-
5.HIDAYAT KHAN AMANULLA KHAN
-
6.KUDRAT ULLA KHAN AMANULLA KHAN
-
7.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR, COLLECTOR, AKOLA
-
8.SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, AND LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BALAPUR, AKOLA
-
9.SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, KATEPURNA, MORNA PROJECT, AKOLA
Case History
-
09-Jun-2026
For Orders -
Registrar (Judicial)
-
05-May-2026
Registrar (Judicial)View PDF
The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Nagpur Bench) heard First Appeal No. 22744 of 2025 on 5th May 2026, wherein Maharashtra State Power Generation Co. Ltd appealed against Maqsooda Bi Shaikh Shabbir and others. The court adjourned the matter, with the appellant's counsel present, standing over after vacation for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Oct-2025
Case filed
The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Nagpur Bench) heard First Appeal No. 22744 of 2025 on 5th May 2026, wherein Maharashtra State Power Generation Co. Ltd appealed against Maqsooda Bi Shaikh Shabbir and others. The court adjourned the matter, with the appellant's counsel present, standing over after vacation for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts