THE AMRAVATI DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP. BANK, LTD., AMRAVATI, THR. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER vs ANIRUDDHA ALIAS BABLUBHAU SUBHANRAO DESHMUKH AND ORS. — WP/6368/2025
Case under Mah. Co-op. Soc. Act Section 226,227. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM040308162025
Filing Number
WP/22479/2025
Filing Date
29-Sep-2025
Registration No
WP/6368/2025
Registration Date
14-Oct-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar
Bench Type
Single
Category
APPOINTMENT OF CONSTITUTIONAL FUNCTIONARIES ( 3 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE AMRAVATI DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP. BANK, LTD., AMRAVATI, THR. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Adv. PARAG ANIL KADU
Respondent(s)
-
1.ANIRUDDHA ALIAS BABLUBHAU SUBHANRAO DESHMUKH AND ORS.
Adv. ,RUGVED BHASKARRAO DHORE,(FOR R 1 TO 9,12 AND
-
2.,BHAVYA C. DHRUV,ABHISHEK TRIPATHI,AYUSHI DANGRE,HARISH DAMODHAR DANGRE,RUGVED BHASKARRAO DHORE,NILESH A GAWANDE,NILESH A GAWANDE,RUGVED BHASKARRAO DHORE,(FOR R 11 AND
-
3.1123
-
4.SURESH S/O BAPURAOJI SABLE
-
5.HARIBHAU S/O YADAVRAO MOHOD
-
6.DAYARAMJI S/O SANU KALE
-
7.SHRIKANT S/O BHIMRAOJI GAWANDE
-
8.SUDHAKAR S/O NARAYANRAO BHARSAKALE
-
9.PURUSHOTTAM ALIAS BALASAHEB S/O BABARAO ALONE
-
10.SAU. MONIKA SANJAYRAO MARDIKAR
-
11.VIRENDRA S/O WALMIKRAO JAGTAP
-
12.SUNIL S/O GOPALRAO WARHADE
-
13.PRAKASH S/O BABARAO KALBANDE
-
14.BALWANT S/O BASVANTRAO WANKHADE
-
15.SMT. SUREKHATAI SURENDRAPANT THAKARE
-
16.OMPRAKASH ALIAS BACCHUBHAU B. KADU
-
17.ABHIJIT S/O PRAVINRAO DHEPE (PATIL)
-
18.AJAY S/O SHANKARRAO MEHKARE
-
19.ANAND S/O NANDKUMAR KALE
-
20.JAIPRAKASH D. PATEL
-
21.SAU. CHITRATAI PRASHANTRAO DAHANE
-
22.NARESHCHANDRA P. THAKRE
-
23.RAVINDRA V. GAIGOLE
Case History
-
05-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. KhubalkarView PDF
Case Summary: WP/6368/2025 Petitioner: Amravati District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. Key Issue: Validity of orders allowing substituted service (newspaper publication) of notices upon 1,100+ proposed party-opponents in a membership dispute. Outcome: Petition ALLOWED. The High Court quashed both the Cooperative Court's order (14.05.2025) and the Cooperative Appellate Court's order (18.09.2025) permitting substituted service via newspaper publication. The court held that the disputants failed to exhaust all regular service modes and that the lower courts issued "cryptic and unreasoned" orders without recording satisfaction that defendants avoided service—mandatory under Order V Rule 20 of the CPC. The court permitted the disputants to retry substituted service only after taking all necessary steps to effect proper service. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
For Pronouncement Of Judgment At 10.30 A.M.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar
-
11-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. KhubalkarView PDF
-
11-Feb-2026
For Admission At 2.30 P.M.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar
-
10-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. KhubalkarView PDF
-
10-Feb-2026
For Admission At 2.30 P.M.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar
-
09-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. KhubalkarView PDF
-
09-Feb-2026
For Admission-Co-Operative Societies Act Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar
-
30-Jan-2026
For Orders -
Registrar (Judicial)
-
27-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. KhubalkarView PDF
-
14-Jan-2026
For Orders -
Registrar (Judicial)
-
19-Dec-2025
Registrar (Judicial)View PDF
-
28-Nov-2025
Registrar (Judicial)View PDF
-
21-Nov-2025
Fresh Admission-Co-Operative Societies Act Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar
-
05-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. KhubalkarView PDF
-
29-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WP/6368/2025
Case Summary: WP/6368/2025 Petitioner: Amravati District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. Key Issue: Validity of orders allowing substituted service (newspaper publication) of notices upon 1,100+ proposed party-opponents in a membership dispute. Outcome: Petition ALLOWED. The High Court quashed both the Cooperative Court's order (14.05.2025) and the Cooperative Appellate Court's order (18.09.2025) permitting substituted service via newspaper publication. The court held that the disputants failed to exhaust all regular service modes and that the lower courts issued "cryptic and unreasoned" orders without recording satisfaction that defendants avoided service—mandatory under Order V Rule 20 of the CPC. The court permitted the disputants to retry substituted service only after taking all necessary steps to effect proper service. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts