(MAHA. STATE ELECTRICITY GEN. CO )MAHA. STATE POWER GENERATION CO. LTD THR. CHIEF ENGINEER, PARAS vs AHEMADKHAN YUNUSKHAN AND OTHERS — CAF/2401/2026
Case under Limitation Act,1963 Section 05. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM040299422025
Filing Number
CAF/21850/2025
Filing Date
22-Sep-2025
Registration No
CAF/2401/2026
Registration Date
12-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin S. Patil
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin S. Patil
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.(MAHA. STATE ELECTRICITY GEN. CO )MAHA. STATE POWER GENERATION CO. LTD THR. CHIEF ENGINEER, PARAS
Adv. GURUNATH EKNATH MOHARIR
Respondent(s)
-
1.AHEMADKHAN YUNUSKHAN AND OTHERS
Case History
-
15-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
23-Jun-2026
—
-
15-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin S. PatilView PDF
Summary of CAF No.2401/2026 The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) heard the civil application filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Generation Company Limited on 15 June 2026. The court issued notice to respondents returnable after four weeks, with respondent No.1 and respondents Nos.2-4 waiving service. In the related CAF No.2402/2026, the court granted a stay on the Land Acquisition Tribunal's judgment (dated 16 May 2025) conditioned upon the appellant depositing the entire decreetal amount within twelve weeks; failure to do so would automatically vacate the stay. The application was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CAF/2401/2026
Summary of CAF No.2401/2026 The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) heard the civil application filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Generation Company Limited on 15 June 2026. The court issued notice to respondents returnable after four weeks, with respondent No.1 and respondents Nos.2-4 waiving service. In the related CAF No.2402/2026, the court granted a stay on the Land Acquisition Tribunal's judgment (dated 16 May 2025) conditioned upon the appellant depositing the entire decreetal amount within twelve weeks; failure to do so would automatically vacate the stay. The application was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts