(MAHA. STATE ELECTRICITY GEN. CO )MAHA. STATE POWER GENERATION CO. LTD THR. CHIEF ENGINEER, PARAS vs YUNUSKHAN YASINKHAN (DEAD) THR. LRS. ASIFKHAN YUSUFKHAN AND OTHERS — CAF/2397/2026

Case under Limitation Act,1963 Section 05. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Next hearing 15-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM040298622025

Filing Number

CAF/21787/2025

Filing Date

22-Sep-2025

Registration No

CAF/2397/2026

Registration Date

12-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin S. Patil

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin S. Patil

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act,1963 Section 05

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.(MAHA. STATE ELECTRICITY GEN. CO )MAHA. STATE POWER GENERATION CO. LTD THR. CHIEF ENGINEER, PARAS

    Adv. GURUNATH EKNATH MOHARIR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.YUNUSKHAN YASINKHAN (DEAD) THR. LRS. ASIFKHAN YUSUFKHAN AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Jun-2026

    —

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin S. PatilView PDF

    Summary of CAF No.2397/2026 In this civil application before the Bombay High Court's Nagpur Bench, Maharashtra State Electricity Generation Company Limited sought a stay of a Land Acquisition Tribunal's judgment dated 16.5.2025. The court granted the stay on 15th June 2026, subject to the condition that the company deposit the entire decretal amount within twelve weeks, with automatic vacation of the stay if the deadline is missed. The application was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 22-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CAF/2397/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CAF No.2397/2026 In this civil application before the Bombay High Court's Nagpur Bench, Maharashtra State Electricity Generation Company Limited sought a stay of a Land Acquisition Tribunal's judgment dated 16.5.2025. The court granted the stay on 15th June 2026, subject to the condition that the company deposit the entire decretal amount within twelve weeks, with automatic vacation of the stay if the deadline is missed. The application was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case