TANVEER BANO WD/O. ABDUL MATIN THR. P.O.A., KIRAN NAMDEORAO MAHALE AND OTHERS vs GODREJ PROPERTIES LIMITED COMPANY, THR. AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, CHIRAG AKRUWALA AND OTHERS — WP/6093/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM040295652025
Filing Number
WP/21558/2025
Filing Date
19-Sep-2025
Registration No
WP/6093/2025
Registration Date
08-Oct-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 25-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.TANVEER BANO WD/O. ABDUL MATIN THR. P.O.A., KIRAN NAMDEORAO MAHALE AND OTHERS
Adv. KABIR RAJ JHAMB,BHUPESH L. PATEL,BHUPESH L. PATEL, UTKARSH MISHRA,RAAJ SURENDRA SEKHSARIA,BHUPESH L. PATEL
-
2.ABDUL AMIN S/O ABDUL MATIN, THR. P.O.A., KIRAN NAMDEORAO MAHALE
-
3.ABDUL MOBEEN S/O ABDUL MATIN, THR. P.O.A., KIRAN NAMDEORAO MAHALE
-
4.YASMIN KHAN W/O JAVED KHAN @ YASMIN D/O ABDUL MATIN, THR. P.O.A., KIRAN NAMDEORAO MAHALE
-
5.NASRIN BANO W/O AHMED SHIEKH @ NASRIN BANO D/O ABDUL MATIN, THR. P.O.A., KIRAN NAMDEORAO MAHALE
-
6.SHIRIN BANO D/O ABDUL MATIN, THR. P.O.A., KIRAN NAMDEORAO MAHALE
-
7.NAZNEEN BANO D/O ABDUL MATIN, THR. P.O.A., KIRAN NAMDEORAO MAHALE
-
8.PARVEEN W/O AJIJ SHEIKH @ PARVEEN D/O ABDUL MATIN, THR. P.O.A., KIRAN NAMDEORAO MAHALE
-
9.ABDUL KHALIL S/O HAJI ABDUL RAUF, THR. P.O.A., KIRAN NAMDEORAO MAHALE
-
10.ABDUL KARIM S/O ABDUL RAUF, THR. P.O.A., KIRAN NAMDEORAO MAHALE
-
11.ABDUL KALEEM S/O ABDUL RAUF, THR. P.O.A., KIRAN NAMDEORAO MAHALE
-
12.ABEDA BEGUM W/O JAFAR ALI @ ABEDA BEGAM D/O ABDUL RAUF, THR. P.O.A., KIRAN NAMDEORAO MAHALE
-
13.SAIDA KHANAM W/O AFSAR KHAN @ SAIDA KHANAM D/O ABDUL RAUF, THR. P.O.A., KIRAN NAMDEORAO MAHALE
-
14.FAMIDA BEGAM W/O SHAKIL KHAN @ FAMIDA BEHAM D/O ABDUL RAUF, THR. P.O.A., KIRAN NAMDEORAO MAHALE
-
15.KHATIJA BEGUM W/O JAKIR AHMED SHEIKH @ KHATIJA BEGAM D/O ABDUL RAUF, THR. P.O.A., KIRAN N. MAHALE
-
16.ABDUL GAFFAR KHAN S/O ABDUL SATTAR KHAN, THR. P.O.A., KIRAN NAMDEORAO MAHALE
-
17.SHAHAJAHA BEGUM D/O ABDUL SATTAR, THR. P.O.A., KIRAN NAMDEORAO MAHALE
-
18.SHAHNAZ PARVEEN W/O IFTEKHAR SAYYED @ SHAHNAAZ PARVEEN D/O ABDUL SATTAR,THR.P.O.A., KIRAN N. MAHALE
-
19.SALAMA BEGAM D/O ABDUL SATTAR, THR. P.O.A., KIRAN NAMDEORAO MAHALE
Respondent(s)
-
1.GODREJ PROPERTIES LIMITED COMPANY, THR. AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, CHIRAG AKRUWALA AND OTHERS
Adv. ,DEOUL PATHAK,(FOR R 25 TO
-
2.,ANIKET SAWAL,HARNISH RAJESH GADHIA,DEOUL PATHAK,ONKAR MILIND BHOPE,AYUSH N. JAIN,RAUNAQ VENKATESH,(FOR R
-
3.,HARNISH RAJESH GADHIA,ANIKET SAWAL,VEDANT NARSING SARDA,(FOR R 9 TO
-
4.,HARNISH RAJESH GADHIA,ANIKET SAWAL,(FOR R
-
5.1123
-
6.GODREJ PROPERTIES LIMITED COMPANY, THR. DIRECTOR MR. PIROJSHA GODREJ
-
7.GODREJ PROPERTIES LIMITED COMPANY, THR. DIRECTOR GAURAV PANDEY
-
8.GODREJ PROPERTIES LIMITED COMPANY, THR. DIRECTOR NADIR GODREJ
-
9.GODREJ PROPERTIES LIMITED COMPANY, THR. DIRECTOR SUTAPA BANERJEE
-
10.GODREJ PROPERTIES LIMITED COMPANY, THR. DIRECTOR DR. INDU BHUSHAN
-
11.GODREJ PROPERTIES LIMITED COMPANY, THR. DIRECTOR JAYASHREE VAIDYANATHAN
-
12.GODREJ PROPERTIES LIMITED COMPANY, THR. DIRECTOR SUMEET NARANG
-
13.SHRI VIMALKUMAR PRALHADRAI AGRAWAL
-
14.MRS. SAROJDEVI VIMALKUMAR AGRAWAL
-
15.MR. SANDEEP VIMALKUMAR AGRAWAL
-
16.SONALKUMAR SANDEEP AGRAWAL
-
17.DIVYANSH AGRAWAL
-
18.MS. TANISHA AGRAWAL
-
19.VISHAL VIMALKUMAR AGRAWAL
-
20.MRS. DEEPSHIKHA VISHAL AGRAWAL
-
21.MS. MANYA VISHAL AGRAWAL THR. THEIR NATURAL GUARDIAN, MR. VISHAL VIMALKUMAR AGRAWAL
-
22.KASHYAP VISHAL AGRAWAL THR. THEIR NATURAL GUARDIAN MR. VISHAL VIMALKUMAR AGRAWAL
-
23.SHRI. ALOK VIMALKUMAR AGRAWAL
-
24.MRS. PRIYANKA ALOK AGRAWAL
-
25.GAUTAM ALOK AGRAWAL
-
26.KUSH ALOK AGRAWAL
-
27.MS. VINITA ATULKUMAR GUPTA
-
28.MS. SHYAMADEVI OMPRAKASH AGRAWAL
-
29.MR. RAJU OMPRAKASH AGRAWAL
-
30.MR. HARSH OMPRAKASH AGRAWAL
-
31.ANAND OMPRAKASH AGRAWAL
Case History
-
15-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. KhubalkarView PDF
SUMMARY: The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) allowed the writ petition and quashed the trial court's order rejecting the plaintiffs' application to amend their plaint in a civil suit involving property declaration, cancellation of sale-deeds, and injunction. The court held that amendments must be allowed at early trial stages when not prejudicial to defendants, especially since defendants had not yet filed written statements, citing the Supreme Court's Life Insurance Corporation ruling on liberal amendment principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
For Admission-Matters Under CIVIL Procedure Code
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar
-
07-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. KhubalkarView PDF
-
07-Apr-2026
For Admission-Matters Under CIVIL Procedure Code
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar
-
26-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. KhubalkarView PDF
-
26-Mar-2026
For Admission-Matters Under CIVIL Procedure Code
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar
-
13-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. KhubalkarView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
For Admission-Matters Under CIVIL Procedure Code
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar
-
13-Mar-2026
For Orders-
Registrar (Judicial)
-
27-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. KhubalkarView PDF
-
20-Feb-2026
Registrar (Judicial)View PDF
-
17-Feb-2026
For Orders-
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar
-
16-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. KhubalkarView PDF
-
24-Dec-2025
For Orders -
Registrar (Judicial)
-
24-Dec-2025
For Orders -
Registrar (Judicial)
-
21-Nov-2025
Registrar (Judicial)View PDF
-
14-Nov-2025
Registrar (Judicial)View PDF
-
11-Nov-2025
For Orders -
Registrar (Judicial)
-
11-Nov-2025
Fresh Admission-Matters Under CIVIL Procedure Code
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar
-
07-Nov-2025
Registrar (Judicial)View PDF
-
23-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. KhubalkarView PDF
-
19-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WP/6093/2025
SUMMARY: The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) allowed the writ petition and quashed the trial court's order rejecting the plaintiffs' application to amend their plaint in a civil suit involving property declaration, cancellation of sale-deeds, and injunction. The court held that amendments must be allowed at early trial stages when not prejudicial to defendants, especially since defendants had not yet filed written statements, citing the Supreme Court's Life Insurance Corporation ruling on liberal amendment principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts