(MAHA. STATE ELECTRICITY GEN. CO )MAHA. STATE POWER GENERATION CO. LTD THR. CHIEF ENGINEER, PARAS vs JAHIR AHEMAD MANJUR AHEMAD AND OTHERS — CAF/2438/2026

Case under Limitation Act,1963 Section 05. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Next hearing 17-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM040292862025

Filing Number

CAF/21350/2025

Filing Date

17-Sep-2025

Registration No

CAF/2438/2026

Registration Date

16-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin S. Patil

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin S. Patil

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act,1963 Section 05

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.(MAHA. STATE ELECTRICITY GEN. CO )MAHA. STATE POWER GENERATION CO. LTD THR. CHIEF ENGINEER, PARAS

    Adv. GURUNATH EKNATH MOHARIR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JAHIR AHEMAD MANJUR AHEMAD AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-Jul-2026

    —

  3. 17-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin S. PatilView PDF

    CAF/2438/2026 Summary The High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench, granted Maharashtra State Electricity Generation Company's (applicant) petition on 17 June 2026. The court condoned a 38-day delay in filing the appeal and directed registration of the appeal. Additionally, the court granted a stay on the judgment and award dated 16.5.2025, conditional upon the applicant depositing the entire decretal amount within twelve weeks; automatic vacation of the stay shall occur if deposit is not made within this period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 17-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CAF/2438/2026

casestatus.in Summary

CAF/2438/2026 Summary The High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench, granted Maharashtra State Electricity Generation Company's (applicant) petition on 17 June 2026. The court condoned a 38-day delay in filing the appeal and directed registration of the appeal. Additionally, the court granted a stay on the judgment and award dated 16.5.2025, conditional upon the applicant depositing the entire decretal amount within twelve weeks; automatic vacation of the stay shall occur if deposit is not made within this period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case